In Fall River, our promise to the elderly went up in smoke | July 20, 2025 | By RICHARD T. MOORE | |
The smell of smoke should never be the last thing a person experiences in their own home. Yet for residents of the Gabriel House assisted living facility in Fall River, that nightmare became a reality last week.
The fire that tore through their building, killing 10 residents and injuring more than 20 others, wasn't just a tragic accident; it was a catastrophic failure of a system that promised safety and delivered a death trap.
Gov. Healey’s emergency safety orders for all 273 assisted living residences in Massachusetts are a necessary first step. But why did it take bodies being carried from a smoldering building to mandate that evacuation routes be posted on a resident's door? Why did it take a fatal blaze for the state to demand that facilities simply report the age of their fire safety systems?
These aren't just uncomfortable questions. They are an indictment.
For too long, we have mistaken compliance paperwork for a culture of safety. We trusted that profit-driven facilities and overstretched state agencies were upholding their end of the bargain. The fire at Gabriel House burned that illusion to the ground.
The fact that the state must now order facilities to communicate safety plans to families reveals a terrifying gap in transparency. The mandate for immediate fire safety assessments confirms what many have feared: that the agencies tasked with oversight may have been flying blind, unaware of the crumbling infrastructure and inadequate protocols inside the very buildings they were supposed to monitor.
This isn't just about one facility. It's about a statewide system where the well-being of our parents and grandparents has been subordinated to bureaucratic convenience and the bottom line. The COVID-19 pandemic already exposed the fragility of our elder care systems. We learned nothing if we are now facing a fire safety crisis that was just as predictable and just as dead
|
|
|
|
If we are serious about preventing the next Fall River, our response cannot end with the governor’s press conference. Real reform is not a suggestion box; it is a set of non-negotiable demands. The industry’s pledges of cooperation are welcome, but trust must be earned through action, not press releases. We must demand:
· Aggressive, Unannounced Inspections. End the charade of facilities self-assessing their way to a passing grade. We need surprise inspections with real teeth and steep, public fines for non-compliance. · Mandatory Staffing-to-Resident Ratios for Evacuations. A perfect evacuation plan is worthless without enough staff to execute it. We must establish and enforce staffing levels sufficient to get every resident out in a crisis, not just on a sunny afternoon. · A "Safe Buildings" Fund and Mandate. The state must create a fund to help older facilities modernize with critical upgrades like sprinkler systems, while also mandating that all facilities meet modern fire codes within a strict timeframe. No more grandfather clauses for safety. · A Public Safety Dashboard. Every family has the right to know the safety record of a facility before they entrust their loved one to its care. All inspection results, violations, and staffing levels must be published online in an easily accessible database.
Implementing these, and other, reforms could be achieved without wasting time for more study. An Assisted Living Commission, established in last year’s long-term care reform law, is due to report within weeks, although its draft report is largely silent on life safety recommendations. The commission should not worry about its August 1 reporting deadline if it gets this issue right. Attorney General Andrea Campbell is on the cusp of releasing new assisted living consumer protection regulations that could easily address issues responsive to the Fall River tragedy. There’s no reason to delay and both actions would be fitting memorials to the victims of the fire.
|
|
|
|
The residents of Gabriel House were more than statistics. They were mothers and fathers, grandmothers and grandfathers. They were people who trusted the Commonwealth to keep them safe in their final years. We broke that trust. We cannot bring them back. But we can honor their memory by ensuring no other family has to receive that horrific phone call.
The true test of our leadership will not be in the flurry of activity last week, but in the sustained, relentless oversight months and years from now, long after the cameras have moved on.
The ashes in Fall River are a stain on our conscience. The wake-up call has sounded. We cannot afford to hit snooze again.
|
|
|
|
ABOUT THE AUTHOR | | Richard T. Moore is a co-founder and legislative chair of Dignity Alliance Massachusetts, a statewide coalition advocating for older adults, people with disabilities, and caregivers. He is a member of the National Consumer Voice Leadership Council and a former Massachusetts state senator.
|
|
|  | The Boston Foundation is deeply committed to civic leadership, and essential to our work is the exchange of informed opinions. We are proud to partner on a platform that engages such a broad range of demographic and ideological viewpoints. |
|
|
|
Submit an Opinion Piece | We welcome informed commentary about local, state and national public policy. Please include the author's contact information when submitting. | | SUBMIT |
|
Submit a Tip | Do you have a scoop you want to share with the CommonWealth Beacon team? We offer several ways to get in touch with and provide materials to our journalists. | | SEND A TIP |
|
|
|
We're hiring!
Want to work for CommonWealth Beacon? We're seeking an experienced Senior Reporter to join the team. | | LEARN MORE |
|
|
|
More Commentary from CommonWealth Voices |  |
| by Maurice Cunningham excerpt:
THE BOSTON GLOBE recently covered a complaint by Defending Education against Smith College’s admission policy on transgender students. Massachusetts policy makers should understand this as a maneuver in the far right’s campaign to undermine freedom of thought and gain control of America’s schools, from kindergarten through higher education. The Globe has covered attacks by Parents Defending Education (the parent of Defending Education) on public education in Newton, Milton, Lexington, and elsewhere. Massachusetts was one of the first states to come under attack by Parents Defending Education after its formation in 2021. A search on the group’s website for “Massachusetts” finds 185 entries. Parents Defending Education is not about parents, or education. It is an obedient servant of right-wing forces out to dumb down American education from K-12 through graduate school. The right’s lever to achieve its goal is to promote racial division and hatred against LGBTQ+ families. For example, in its first year of operation PDE filed a complaint with the US Department of Education and eventually a lawsuit alleging that the Wellesley schools were violating the civil rights of white students by hosting an online “healing space” for students of color after a mass shooting of Asian American women in Atlanta. PDE has filed similar lawsuits across the country involving education about America’s history of racial injustice, or the police murder of George Floyd.
| |
|
| | by Emily Cherniack excerpt: THE TRIBUTES BEGAN pouring in the moment the news broke: David Gergen—advisor to four presidents, Harvard professor, political commentator, public intellectual—had passed away. And rightfully so. He was a man whose career traced the arc of American political life for the past half-century, someone who stood at the elbows of power in moments that defined the nation. But those obituaries, however rich and admiring, miss something essential. They chronicle his proximity to power but overlook one of the most powerful things about him: David Gergen never believed that public service was only for the elite, the famous, or the already powerful. He believed it was for everyone. And he lived that belief in the most generous, human ways—far from the marble halls and green rooms where he so often walked.
I knew of David Gergen long before I ever met him. He was one of those names—like “Kissinger” or “Carville”—that signified a proximity to the presidency. But I met a very different David in 2012 when I was launching New Politics, an organization committed to recruiting servant leaders—veterans, AmeriCorps alumni, Peace Corps volunteers—into politics.
| |
|
| | by Gary Klein
excerpt: At the close of its spring term, the Supreme Court dealt a serious blow to the power of all Americans to protect themselves from illegal government actions. In Trump v. CASA, Inc., the court held that individuals, organizations, and even state governments cannot obtain “universal” injunctions from a federal court that are binding across the country. Preservation of the rule of law for all Americans now requires that we turn to other strategies to hold the Trump administration accountable. Expanded use of class actions against the federal government appears to be among the best remaining options to secure our rights and prevent government overreach.
The practice of obtaining universal injunctions, often referred to as “nationwide” injunctions, had become a favored tactic of aggrieved individuals and organizations seeking to protect against overreaching government action. The tactic had been used against the government by partisans of all stripes, often on ideological grounds. It was employed, with frustrating success, during recent Democratic administrations by Republicans (who filed many cases in Texas or Florida). More recently, the tables have been turned by Democrats (filing in jurisdictions like California, Washington, or Massachusetts).
| |
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.