Saturday, June 21, 2025

POLITICO Massachusetts Playbook: The Karen Read race

 

Massachusetts Playbook logo

 

The Karen Read race

****TRUMP'S ATTACKS ON EDUCATION - HE LIKES STUPID PEOPLE! FOREIGN STUDENTS CONTRIBUTE TO THE ECONOMY. THEY ARE AMONG THE BEST & BRIGHTEST THEIR NATIONS OFFER!**** 

But anyhow, as I and others have pointed out, the tuition and other expenses that foreign students pay to study at places like Harvard is a major source of foreign exchange earnings. Last year, we got more than $56 billion in revenue from these students.


NEW BEDFORD IS FINDING SOLUTIONS - OTHER COMMUNITIES SHOULD  FOLLOW THEIR LEAD!

EW BEDFORD — The little ranch-style house was boarded up and the grass was overgrown. Squatters had been in and out. Trash and at least one needle were scattered in the backyard. A bank owned the property, but seemed to have forgotten about it.

City housing officials made yet another visit to the house one recent morning. Jordan Latham, the city’s vacant property development manager, noticed someone peek through the curtains of the house next door.

“Hi! We’re with the city!” she shouted as she waved and hurried over.

Bouchra Msatfi emerged in a multicolor maxi dress and a gray headwrap. It was as if she had been waiting for this moment.

“We’re suffering,” she said. She was terrified of the squatters. Three of them were coming and going from the vacant house, doing drugs, knocking down her fence, breaking into her shed. “I am worried about my children.”

For the past year and a half, it has been Latham’s job to get vacant properties like this one back into use. Under her watch, dozens of empty houses across the city have come back on the market. Latham says she’s helped several property owners and their heirs overcome legal and financial obstacles they couldn’t tackle on their own.

This bank-owned house has been one of Latham’s biggest challenges.

Latham asked question after question. When was the last time Msatfi saw the squatters? Did she call the police? What did the squatters do in her backyard?

Msatfi wanted to know what the city was going to do. 

“We’re taking it really seriously,” Latham said. 

Latham and her team started brainstorming on their ride back to the office.

“We need an urgent strategy over there,” said Josh Amaral, the city’s director of housing and community development.

They sent police and code enforcement officers that same day to further board up the house, sealing the openings the squatters had slipped through. They called the bank again, demanding that it sell the property as quickly as possible. They asked homeless outreach workers to start monitoring the house to see if the squatters came back. And they made a plan for the state attorney general’s office to appoint a receiver to take responsibility for the property if the bank doesn’t act soon.

The properties that stay vacant the longest often need this kind of intensive intervention, officials say. They have problems — usually legal ones — that the private market can’t solve. That’s why the city created Latham’s position in 2023 as part of its housing plan.

“This was like half of a function of half of a department,” Amaral said in an interview. “Now that we’re able to put more eyes on it, we’re able to spend time developing systems that more adequately address it and track the success of what we’re doing over time.”

About 215 properties are on New Bedford’s vacant building registry, down from 399 two years ago. Credit: Grace Ferguson / The New Bedford Light

New Bedford has a severe housing shortage that has driven up prices beyond what many residents can afford. One recent report estimated the city needs 4,100 more units to meet current demand. Latham and her team see their vacant property work as one more way the city can put more homes back on the market.

The number of properties on the city’s vacant building registry has fallen from 399 to 215 since Latham joined the city in late 2023. The tally includes apartment buildings. So the total number of empty housing units reflected on the registry has declined to about 300 as of December 2024 — down from 570 in September 2023. 

Latham said local developers want these properties. “They’ll take it if there’s a missing roof,” she said.

She meant that literally. On their tour with a Light reporter, officials pointed out a roofless property that a developer was looking to buy.

“The reality is, a lot of these are blocked by certain circumstances, and if they’re unblocked, the private market can deal with it,” Amaral said.

Even the most distressed properties can be worth a lot of money, Latham said. She and Amaral said heirs to properties that are severely behind on taxes could still walk away with $10,000 or $20,000 in remaining equity.

Why don’t they?

Latham said the most common problem she runs into is that the owner died with no will. That means the estate has to go through probate court, a complicated and expensive process that sometimes can’t be done without a lawyer. Title issues and other confusing claims on properties can add even more friction. 

Dozens of bank-owned properties are also languishing around the city simply because the banks haven’t gotten around to selling them, Latham said.

About half of the city’s vacant properties that aren’t actively under construction are behind on property taxes, officials said. Their total tax bill adds up to $2,767,559.

The longer properties sit empty, the harder they are to rehabilitate, housing officials said. Late taxes and code violations can quickly eat up the property’s equity. The structure deteriorates, further cutting into its value and increasing renovation costs. Squatters can get in. Neighbors have to live near an ugly and potentially unsafe house.

Latham’s approach

One reason the city’s list of vacant buildings has been shrinking is that the private market has acted without the city’s intervention, housing officials said. Rising property values and soaring housing demand have made it easier for developers to pull off renovations that would have been too expensive a few years ago, officials said.

Vacant Property Development Manager Jordan Latham uses software that merges data from across city departments to help her identify potentially vacant properties. Credit: Grace Ferguson / The New Bedford Light

Latham said about 50 buildings that received some intervention from the city have come back onto the market, or will be listed soon. About 60 additional buildings are actively being rehabilitated, she said.

She monitors properties using city software that merges data from various city departments. That’s a change from the city’s past approach to managing vacant properties, which relied on neighbor complaints.

If a property’s water meter hasn’t shown any flow in months, or if it’s racking up code violations and tax liens, those are signs a property could be vacant. She said she also keeps an eye on death notices so she can jump in if the heirs run into trouble with the estate.

Latham coordinates with 15 different city departments in monthly meetings of the city’s Vacant Property Working Group. They flag empty properties they come across while enforcing other city codes, and they coordinate on how to respond together.

If a property’s water meter hasn’t shown any flow in months, or if it’s racking up code violations and tax liens, those are signs a property could be vacant. Credit: Grace Ferguson / The New Bedford Light

Most cities deal with vacant properties by slapping them with escalating fines and filing lawsuits to take control of them. New Bedford isn’t abandoning those approaches, but Latham’s work adds a strategy that doesn’t punish owners who need help.

“It’s just being that liaison for these individuals with a very intimidating process,” Latham said.

People call Latham with all kinds of problems. One elderly woman didn’t know what to do after her brother, a hoarder, died and left behind a house stuffed with belongings, so Latham researched local junk removal companies. A family working on a renovation project was afraid to be scammed by phony contractors, so Latham gave them a list of professionals the city had vetted.

Latham’s work on each property usually starts with an official letter informing the owner or heirs that they need to register the property as vacant. She follows up with a friendlier letter to introduce herself and offer help, with her number at the bottom. She resorts to cold calling if neither of those work, but she said she gets frequent responses to the letters alone.

“Sometimes people call and they’ll be saying, ‘Thank you for this letter; this is maybe the kick in the pants we needed,’” she said.

Housing officials pointed out success stories as they toured the city with a Light reporter this month. One property with a long-deceased owner was more than $100,000 behind in taxes, but Latham has helped the owner’s heirs in North Carolina make a plan to get the property through probate court.

“This one, we have worked very closely with the family,” Latham said as they pulled up to a boarded-up, pale green house in the South End.

The heirs of this home were in Portugal, she said, and the trust that owned the property had no trustee. Latham put the heirs in touch with a local probate lawyer who helped them sort out the estate. The home was condemned and had squatters at one point, but now, it’s about to be sold to a developer, she said.

In the West End, another empty property is about to be sold after Latham got in touch with an heir in Virginia. He overcame the complexities of a reverse mortgage and missing trust documents with the help of a probate lawyer, she said.

Another challenge was, literally, around the corner.

“This gentleman’s heirs are in Tanzania,” Latham said, pointing out a brick house. “How am I gonna find them?”

Probate problems

Latham said she has learned more about probate than she ever thought she would.

“It can be a very daunting process, even if there is a will,” Latham said. “It is easily the biggest hurdle we have found.”

While it’s possible for a regular person to probate an estate on their own, many families need a lawyer to help them navigate more complex cases. That can cost about $5,000 to $10,000 upfront, with the rest of the legal fees coming out of the estate. 

“People then just stall,” Latham said. “They’re like, ‘This is gonna stink, this is too much.’”

Sentimental value plays a role, too. Some heirs don’t want to sell their family property, but they have no other way of paying a lawyer to guide them through probate. Others insist that they want to fix a dilapidated home to “keep it in the family,” but they aren’t prepared for such a major renovation project.

New Bedford needs more lawyers willing to write wills and file probate cases pro-bono for less affluent families, Latham said. She has reached out to the UMass Law School to see if it can help.

Vacant Property Development Manager Jordan Latham tracked down heirs in North Carolina for this long-vacant property. Credit: Grace Ferguson / The New Bedford Light

It’s more important to get properties through probate now than it was a few years ago, Amaral said. That’s because Massachusetts recently updated its tax foreclosure laws in ways that protect homeowners’ equity but make the process harder, longer, and more expensive for cities. 

Housing office staff said some heirs have told them they were just waiting for the city to foreclose on the property and sell it — something the city is now loath to do because of the time and expense.

It’s not just probate that holds properties back. Other confusing legal barriers get in the way of heirs taking responsibility for a property, Latham said.

Heirs often feel like there’s nothing they can do if their family’s home has a reverse mortgage, so they wait for the bank to act, she said. But she has found that there are ways the heirs can keep the property, or sell it and potentially walk away with some equity.

She has found similar problems with claims on properties by MassHealth, the state-sponsored health insurance program. The agency seeks to recoup costs from long-term care by putting a lien on the patient’s property, which it can then foreclose on after the patient dies.

These liens tend to be worth more than the entire cost of a property, housing officials said — in one case, they found a MassHealth lien worth $1 million. But the agency doesn’t always foreclose on the lien quickly. Heirs have no incentive to move the process along because they know they won’t get any equity in the end.

Housing officials said they had a “very productive” call with MassHealth’s estate recovery team this month, and they plan to keep working together.

Helping neighbors

Msatfi, who lived next to the squatter house, told housing officials she had moved in just a month and a half ago. It was the first home she had ever owned, and now she was afraid to let her children play outside in her new yard. She started to tear up. 

Ashley Eaton, the city’s neighborhood planner, gave her a hug. She, Amaral, and Latham all promised Msatfi they were doing everything they could to hold the bank accountable.

Latham held her hand and said she was a mom, too. 

“It will be OK. Just keep calling the police,” she said. “We will address this.”

Email Grace Ferguson at gferguson@newbedfordlight.org


Part 1 of a series

Two former campaign staffers who helped lead the Yes on 4 ballot initiative that would have regulated psychedelic therapy and decriminalized psychedelic use and home cultivation in Massachusetts have filed a series of complaints to the state Office of Campaign and Political Finance (OCPF) alleging violations of campaign finance law. 

Despite leading in the polls just a week prior to election day last fall, the Yes on 4 initiative ultimately fell short by nearly 14 points, leaving voters and supporters wondering what went wrong. Following stories in this series will look into possible reasons why the initiative failed, but former leaders of the Yes on 4 initiative first point to alleged irregularities in the financing of the campaign. 

Former Yes on 4 staffers Graham Moore and Jamie Morey say that they went public with their complaints because they did not want other state campaigns supporting reform of laws regulating psychedelics to face the same alleged issues as the Yes on 4 referendum committee – formally known as Massachusetts for Mental Health Options (MMHO).

In one of the complaints that he filed to the OCPF, Moore alleges that he “uncovered what appears to be over $700,000 of MMHO-related spending that was not properly disclosed to the OCPF as in-kind contributions.”

After the conclusion of the campaign, Morey and Moore started a new advocacy venture, Mass Healing, to build on the groundwork laid before and during the Yes on 4 operation. The nonprofit is instrumental in crafting ten of the twelve psychedelics-related bills that were filed by state lawmakers in January. 

Morey and Moore’s complaints to the OCPF about alleged campaign finance violations focus on the Yes on 4 initiative ballot question committee that they formerly helped lead, not Mass Healing. According to Morey, the Yes on 4 digital campaign assets were transferred to Mass Healing at the conclusion of the campaign, but Mass Healing received no funding from the committee. 

The Yes on 4 initiative was first proposed by Washington, D.C.-based New Approach PAC which led prior statewide psychedelic ballot initiative efforts in Oregon and Colorado, respectively. “Mass Healing was formed completely independently from the campaign and received no financial compensation or support from New Approach or the Yes 4 Campaign, other than a single year subscription to Squarespace,” said Morey. “I requested Jared [Jared Moffat, New Approach Policy Director] transfer the digital campaign assets (website list and social media accounts) which he agreed to.”

The complaints about the Yes on 4 campaign were first filed anonymously and then, on June 13, Moore and Morey stepped forward as the co-authors. In a joint statement provided to Lucid News and the Boston Institute for Nonprofit Journalism (BINJ), Moore and Morey said, “We came forward to prevent the same misconduct from derailing access in other states and because we strongly believe the psychedelic reform movement must be safeguarded by those with a commitment to ethical integrity.”

Asked whether they filed the complaints to OCPF to improve their fundraising position for Mass Healing, Morey said that this was not their motivation. “We decided to speak out for the reasons previously mentioned in our joint statement.”

The complaints specifically allege that New Approach and Massachusetts for Mental Health Options (MMHO), utilized nonprofit organizations Open Circle Alliance (OCA) and Heroic Hearts Project (HHP) in consultation with “grasstops” political consulting firm Dewey Square Group – as extensions of their political operation, allowing the campaign to raise and spend money without the transparency required by law.  

According to their organization’s website, Open Circle Alliance was created “to enhance public understanding of psychedelic substances, build a supportive network, amplify existing work, promote safety and collaboration, and advocate for the best possible psychedelic policies for Massachusetts.” 

The Heroic Hearts Project says on its website that it “has helped hundreds of veterans overcome their suffering from PTSD”—providing veterans access to psychedelic-assisted therapy outside of the US, along with supporting psychedelic research and advocacy efforts at the state and federal level.

Moore and Morey also allege that the campaign benefited from resources of OCA and HHP which are nonprofit organizations that are supposed to remain politically neutral. According to the complaints, the nonprofits raised funds for their stated missions, but these funds were used to help finance Yes on 4 campaign activities. Such spending, if proven to have gone unreported by OCA and HHP, would constitute prohibited campaign activity for 501(c)(3)s.

Watchdog Groups Comment On the Allegations 

“These allegations should be concerning for the public,” says Heather Ferguson, director of state operations for Common Cause, a campaign finance watchdog organization based in Washington, D.C. in a statement provided in response to the allegations. 

“When donors give to a tax-exempt organization it is imperative that the organization only use those funds for public education about an issue and that the organization does not violate their trust by spending those funds for electioneering. 501(c)(4) organizations [like New Approach] with the primary purpose of electioneering are legally not allowed to coordinate their activities with a 501(c)(3) as this complaint alleges between Open Circle Alliance, [Heroic Hearts Project] and [the Yes on 4 campaign].”

At the federal level, the IRS notes on its website that “a section 501(c)(3) organization may make a contribution to a ballot measure committee,” but 501(c)(3)s, “must include such contributions in its lobbying calculations for purposes of determining whether a substantial part of its activities consist of attempting to influence legislation.”

“During our time working on the psychedelics campaign and in the months after its failure, we became aware of a pattern of mismanagement that wasted the money of individual donors and supporting organizations, contributed to the failure of the ballot question, and delayed lifesaving access to healing for the citizens of our state,” said Moore and Morey in their statement. 

Nonprofits Named In Complaint Asked To Comment 

Lucid News has reached out several times to the nonprofits named in the OCPF complaints for comment on the allegations. In a statement provided via email, Heroic Hearts Project founder Jesse Gould acknowledged, “we are aware that a complaint has been filed. We don’t comment on pending complaints or ongoing matters under review. OCPF hasn’t elevated these isolated claims or issued any findings or determinations, so we will respect that process. We always remain committed to transparency and integrity in all of our activities and will continue to move forward with the important work of serving veteran families.”

Representatives from New Approach, Open Circle Alliance, and Dewey Square Group have not responded to multiple requests by Lucid News and BINJ for comment.

What The Law Requires and What is Alleged 

Massachusetts law requires organizations that raise and spend money to support ballot initiatives to publicly register and disclose their financial activities. Donations to 501(c)(3) organizations are tax-deductible, while contributions to ballot question committees are not. By moving donations through Heroic Hearts, the whistleblowers allege that New Approach provided its donors with two benefits they would not have otherwise received: a tax deduction and anonymity, as 501(c)(3) donors can remain private while ballot question committee donors must be publicly disclosed.

According to Moore and Morey’s complaints, the PAC’s arrangement with HHP allegedly created a “slush fund” for New Approach to use without oversight. According to the IRS, if the more than $500,000 spent by Heroic Hearts on the ballot question – which is documented in the complaints – exceeds 20% of its total expenditures, the organization’s 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status could be jeopardized.

The complaints also claim that New Approach Policy Director Jared Moffat directed payments from HHP to individuals working on the campaign, which could be considered a “contribution that was made in a way that conceals its true origin.” For example, one email cited in the complaints allegedly shows Moffat informing campaign staff member Morey that, “HHP already has money set aside for this, yes but not ‘for the campaign.’”

“If an entity raises money to support or oppose a question, it must organize as a ballot question committee,” OCPF Education Director Jason Tait wrote in response to a request for comment. “‘Raises money’” he said, “is the key [term].”

“Entities can also use their general treasury to support or oppose a question,” Tait continued. “No ballot question committee is required.”

“Bottom line: everything is disclosed, if money is raised or spent. In-kind contributions are things of value that are not money, such as goods and services.”

In response to Moore’s filings, the OCPF acknowledged receipt of the complaints and confirmed the information provided was forwarded to their legal department. According to Tait, any future updates on the status of the complaints won’t be known anytime soon. “Those resolutions are not made public until the case is resolved,” said Tait. 

Close Relationship Between Open Circle Alliance and the Campaign

Further allegations cited in the complaints highlight the close relationship between the Yes on 4 campaign and Open Circle Alliance. 

Moore’s initial complaint notes that “Open Circle Alliance directors Stefanie Jones and Rebecca Slater were asked to coordinate a ‘weekly MA psychedelic outreach meeting’ with Moffat, referendum committee chair Danielle McCourt, [Grassroots Campaign Director for the Yes on 4 Campaign Emily] Oneschuk, and two other campaign staffers.” Moore alleges that “no in-kind contributions from Open Circle Alliance were reported to OCPF.” Moore also points out that Oneschuk simultaneously served as the Director and Treasurer of the Open Circle Alliance, giving her control over the charity’s finances while also supposedly leading the campaign.
OCA’s website highlights that the group’s founders were “brought together after learning of the 2024 ballot initiative that would create regulated access to psychedelic therapy for Massachusetts.” In one email exchange provided by Moore and Morey to support the OCPF complaints, one of the OCA co-founders wrote that the “idea and funding for a community org originated in collaboration with New Approach.”

”As shown,” Moore wrote in one of the filings, “100% of Open Circle Alliance’s publicly advertised events (and 5/6 of all the organization’s events) were de facto [Q4] campaign events.”The filings also point to several instances of alleged coordination between the campaign and Open Circle Alliance, including a suggestion to use OCA to sell T-shirts as a fundraising mechanism for the campaign and the dedication of time during Yes on 4 meetings to plan OCA’s official launch party, as well as hosting a “private, unadvertised Q&A/town hall event for ‘plant medicine guides.’’”

The complaints additionally allege that OCA’s educational materials consist solely of “Question 4” fact sheets that claim the alliance “is not associated with the Yes on 4 Campaign and strives to present clear and neutral information.“ According to the whistleblowers, the group’s claimed neutrality appears to be misleading and seemingly in violation of the legal separation required between the entities under Chapter 55 of Massachusetts’ General Laws — especially given Oneschuk’s dual-leadership role for both the campaign and OCA.

Based on the evidence provided in his complaints, Moore said in the first OCPF complaint he filed that  “Jared Moffat, the policy director for New Approach, [was] directing payments from the 501(c)(3) organization Heroic Hearts Project to individuals affiliated with the campaign, none of which were disclosed to the OCPF as in-kind contributions.”

The complaints by Moore and Morey also assert that an advertisement for what was described as Heroic Hearts Project’s “educational ad campaign” was actually produced by the ballot measure committee and Dewey Square Group. In the filings made with the OCPF, it is alleged that the purported oversight of both the campaign and HHP ads shows the latter was intended to support the referendum.

Other Alleged Missteps in the Campaign 

If the allegations laid out in the complaints are true, they would be just the latest in a series of apparent missteps that took place from the beginning of the Yes on 4 campaign. Questions have also been raised about Yes on 4’s financial backing from the start of the campaign, especially after the campaign amassed a nearly $9 million war chest from mostly out-of-state donors in support of an overwhelmingly popular drug policy reform issue on a comparatively nationwide scale. 

As documented by this reporter in February 2024, New Approach PAC, donated $35,000 to Bay Staters for Natural Medicine (BSNM), a local grassroots group. Shortly after accepting the donation, James Davis, the founder of BSNM, turned on the bill he had once endorsed to form an opposition coalition with prominent prohibitionist organizations Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM) and the Foundation for Drug Policy Solutions (FDPS). 

Shortly after his defection from the Yes on 4 coalition, this reporter showed how Davis appears to have  impersonated online US Marine veteran Mike Botelho, a former BSNM collaborator, seemingly in an effort to advance his own personal and political agenda.

The Question 4 campaign also ran into a ballot signature snafu in 2023, wherein 12,000 previously collected signatures were ruled invalid due to the illegal use of a labor union logo on some signature collection sheets.

Reflections on the Campaign 

The failure of the Question 4 campaign has influenced future policy reform efforts in the Bay State and beyond. New Approach PAC representatives have largely placed the blame for the initiative’s historic loss on voters’ supposed hesitancy over decriminalizing home cultivation of psychedelics.

“We understand there were concerns [from voters] about the home grow provisions, and those concerns likely led to tonight’s result,” the PAC wrote in an official election night statement.

Other grassroots leaders, in addition to Moore and Morey, have expressed frustration about the allegations filed to the OCPF. Fellow Bay State psychedelic advocacy stalwart Imani Turnbull-Brown – a US Navy Veteran and co-founder of the Boston-based Entheogen Melanin Collective – offered a scathing rebuke of Open Circle Alliance’s alleged campaign finance violations.

“Open Circle Alliance’s dishonesty and lack of remorse are unacceptable and this isn’t a small mistake— it’s a breach of trust that harms the very communities they claim to uplift,” said Turnbull-Brown who, together with other activists, says she has spoken with Open Circle staff about their funding sources.

“If they truly care about equity and access they need to own the harm, speak the truth, and make it right. Silence and spin won’t cut it. The movement is watching—and so are the people most impacted.”


This article was published in a partnership between Lucid News and the Boston Institute for Nonprofit Journalism. This article is syndicated by the MassWire news service of the Boston Institute for Nonprofit Journalism.

Part two of this series will look into possible reasons why the Yes on 4 campaign failed despite having significant funding and widespread support for the initiative. 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

My Message to Trump and Fox…

  My Message to Trump and Fox… Ben Meiselas and MeidasTouch Network Dec 5 By Ben Meiselas You both started this week by attacking Meidas. It...