Sunday, August 3, 2025

A nation of immigrants imperiled

 


ADVERTISEMENT

We can help you fight the heat without losing control of your energy bill. Learn more. Eversource.

sponsored by The Boston Foundation



The Best of CommonWealth Beacon  OPINION

A nation of immigrants imperiled

August 3, 2025

By LANE GLENN 

At the recent graduation ceremony for Northern Essex Community College’s Center for Adult Education, we celebrated the accomplishments of 24 students who had completed their high school equivalency exams, dozens more who finished English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) programs, 15 inductees into the National Adult Education Honor Society, and six newly naturalized citizens of the United States, who, waving American flags, treated the crowd to a surprise performance of “God Bless America.” 


Adult education programs like these are offered by community colleges, school districts, and non-profit organizations across the country, and are in high demand by people seeking a second chance at improving their lives through education; by employers looking for talented, credentialed workers in a tight labor market; and by immigrants drawn to the promise of America. 


Recently, these programs were at risk, as the Trump administration announced that $716 million in adult education program funding that was supposed to be distributed to states by July 1 was being withheld. The administration said the freeze on these funds was due to a wider review of resources allocated to education, under suspicion that, according to a spokesperson at the Office of Management and Budget, “Many of these grant programs have been grossly misused to subsidize a radical leftwing agenda.”  


Last week, facing mounting criticism, the Trump administration said that it will release the adult education funds – along with more than $4 billion in other funding for K-12 schools and higher education that had also been held back.  


That news was a huge relief. Still in place, however, is a directive in letters sent by the US Department of Education to colleges rescinding guidance that had been in place since 1997 that allowed federal funds to be used for undocumented residents in some adult education programs. The letters notified them the “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders” executive order signed by President Trump in February is intended to “prevent spending of American taxpayer dollars on Federal assistance for illegal aliens,” and therefore, colleges should no longer admit undocumented students into these programs. 


While the focus in these recent announcements is on ending federal support for undocumented residents, it is clear from other White House communications and actions that the broader agenda is to practically eliminate immigration into the United States entirely.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Inclusion. It's worth it. Global View Communications.



In both of his terms in office, the Trump administration has taken aim at each of the principal ways that people from other countries can become naturalized United States citizens, including: 

  • Family-based sponsorship: A way for a US citizen or lawful permanent resident to sponsor close relatives for a green card that President Trump has derided as “chain migration,” and vowed to curtail by reducing the categories of eligible family members, increasing income requirements, and imposing stricter, more time-consuming vetting processes. 

  • Employment-based sponsorship: A way for an employer to sponsor a foreign national for a green card with a qualifying job offer that Trump is aggressively trying to limit through stricter interpretation of H1-B visa requirements, setting higher wage requirements for work visas, and enhanced vetting of visa applications, which slows processing time and presents barriers for employers seeking to fill vacant positions. 

  • Refugee or asylee status: A process used to recognize individuals fleeing their home country because of a fear of persecution that the Trump administration has nearly eliminated by suspending the US Refugee Admissions Program, suspending asylum applications for anyone attempting to cross America’s southern border, and ending Temporary Protected Status designations for asylees from Afghanistan, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, and other strife-torn nations. 

These steps are in addition to the Trump administration’s attempts to end birthright citizenship, which has been guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution since 1868; and severely limit the number of international students studying at American universities through travel bans, suspension of visa interviews, social media vetting, and other steps designed to dissuade aspiring scholars from other countries from considering American higher education. 


Despite this array of restrictions on everyday people attempting to emigrate to the United States, Trump has proposed, and even set up a web site for wealthy foreigners interested in applying for, the “Trump Card,” which offers US citizenship to anyone willing to pay $5 million for the privilege


ADVERTISEMENT

National Grid. We're here with solutions to help manage your summer energy bills. Lean more.

The president is not alone in pursuing these immigration restrictions.  Although it passed by the narrowest possible margin in Congress, the recently enacted “One Big, Beautiful Bill Act” contains a number of provisions, like a 300 percent increase in funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), $45 billion for construction of ICE detention facilities, and $46 billion for border wall construction, designed to deter would-be immigrants to America. 


Taken together, Trump’s executive orders since January and his signing of the “One Big, Beautiful Bill” Act represent a radical shift in federal policy toward immigrants, based largely on myths and misinformation, like claims that immigrants are overrunning the US population, are more prone to committing violent crime, and are taking American jobs or relying on welfare assistance. In fact: 

  • The proportion of foreign-born residents of the US is the same today as it was in the early 1900s. While the share of the population made up immigrants has increased in recent decades, it is now same as it was at the turn of the 20th century. According to the Migration Policy Institute, in 1910, 14.7 percent of US residents were born in other countries. Today, that figure is slightly lower, at 14.3 percent. 

  • Immigration is stabilizing our population. Massachusetts has experienced a net migration of native-born citizens out of the state each year since 2011, and we have slipped from 9th to 16th place in population size. Immigration has been the only way we did not actually lose population overall. And the same is true across New England, which has the oldest average population of any region in the country and, as the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston has noted, is being reenergized through immigration.  The consequences of losing population are significant, and include a smaller workforce, fewer consumers, and fewer representatives in Washington. 

  • Immigrants are educated: According to the Migration Policy Institute, 48 percent of recently arrived immigrants have a college degree, compared to only 38 percent of native-born Americans. 

  • Immigrants are law-abiding: One of the big fears often stoked about immigrants is crime, and accusations that those seeking asylum or citizenship are violent criminals. But numerous studies over the years have demonstrated conclusively that immigrants commit fewer crimes and have lower rates of incarceration than native-born US citizens. 

  • Immigration improves our economy: According to a study from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, “Most economists agree that the effects of immigration on the US economy are broadly positive,” and include: 

    • Increased wages: Immigrants often do not compete for the same jobs as native US citizens, putting minimal downward pressure on wages. Rather, immigrants’ consumer needs increase the demands for goods and services, and studies find that immigration has actually raised average wages of native-born workers over the past few decades. 

    • Improved innovation: Immigrants account for a disproportionately high share of patent filings, science and technology graduates, and senior positions at top venture capital-funded firms. In addition, the presence of immigrants often creates opportunities for less-skilled native workers to become more specialized in their work, thereby increasing their productivity. 

    • Higher tax revenue: Contrary to one often expressed belief, most immigrants, including those in the country without authorization, pay significantly more in taxes over a lifetime than they consume in government services. According to a report by Pew Research, immigrants in the US illegally contribute more than $12 billion annually in state and local taxes. The average estimated tax rate of unauthorized immigrants is 8 percent, while the wealthiest one percent of Americans pay just over 5 percent. Approximately 75 percent of unauthorized immigrants contribute to Social Security—a benefit they are not even eligible to receive. 

    • Saving retirement: The US population is getting older. In 1990, there were five workers in America for every retiree. Now, there are only three. Without immigration, by 2030 that ratio will fall to only two—not enough to sustain our population of retirees. 

Over the past few national election cycles, our nation has seemingly swung from one extreme to another as each party has sought to impose its vision for immigration on a population that appears equally divided over which way to turn. 


A few years ago, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, ever the pragmatist, suggested that what we really need is “A high wall with a big gate,” an approach that would balance our very real need for national security and social cohesion with our equally compelling need for shoring up our aging, birth-rate-declining population with the energy and vibrancy of immigrants seeking a better way of life. 


The last time Congress passed meaningful comprehensive immigration reform that moved us in that direction was nearly 40 years ago, when President Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which imposed penalties on employers who knowingly hired undocumented immigrants and increased funding for border security, but also provided amnesty and a path to citizenship for nearly three million undocumented immigrants. 


President Reagan, and indeed leaders of both political parties until recently, recognized the importance of immigration to the very essence of what it means to be an American. 


In his final speech as president, which is worth taking a few minutes to watch as a reminder of why he was called “the great communicator,” Reagan noted, “We lead the world because, unique among nations, we draw our people—our strength—from every country and every corner of the world. And by doing so we continuously renew and enrich our nation.”  


Then he cautioned, “If we ever close the door to new Americans, our leadership in the world would soon be lost.” 


Four decades later, under the policies being implemented by the Trump administration, we are rapidly spiraling in the direction Reagan feared for the nation. 


Reagan added one more particularly poignant point, which was inescapably obvious to the crowd watching those half-dozen newly naturalized American citizens wave their flags and sing “God Bless America” at the recent graduation ceremony for Northern Essex’s Center for Adult Education: “Those who become American citizens love this country even more.” 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Lane Glenn is president of Northern Essex Community College. He is a member of the board of MassINC, the nonprofit civil organization that publishes CommonWealth Beacon. 


The Boston Foundation is deeply committed to civic leadership, and essential to our work is the exchange of informed opinions. We are proud to partner on a platform that engages such a broad range of demographic and ideological viewpoints.

Submit an Opinion Piece

We welcome informed commentary about local, state and national public policy. Please include the author's contact information when submitting.

SUBMIT

Submit a Tip

Do you have a scoop you want to share with the CommonWealth Beacon team?  We offer several ways to get in touch with and provide materials to our journalists.

SEND A TIP

We're hiring!


Want to work for CommonWealth Beacon?

We're seeking an experienced Senior Reporter to join the team.

LEARN MORE

More Commentary from CommonWealth Voices

Nicotine bans are tired ‘nanny state’ politics

by Peter Brennan  


excerpts: 

MASSACHUSETTS LAWMAKERS are again trying to take away your civil liberties – but a growing number of cities and towns are saying “no.”

In an era where transparency, government accountability and personal freedoms are in peril every day, it is rather stunning that state legislators want to impose bans on tobacco and nicotine products that will forever prohibit anyone born after January 1, 2006, from being able to purchase legal adult products.

The more people learn about the deceptively named Nicotine Free Generation law, the less they like it. Most recently, Bellingham town meeting voters rejected NFG, while in Manchester-By-The-Sea, town meeting voters decided to rescind an NFG bylaw quietly implemented by the appointed board of health. Similar NFG bylaws have been rejected in Worcester, Peabody, Milton and Westfield.

The fact is, voters are tired of nanny state policies and lawmakers legislating their version of morality. Supporting programs to curb smoking and youth tobacco use is good public policy, but NFG will accomplish neither. Instead, it will only eliminate adult rights, harm small businesses, strip away millions in tax dollars from Massachusetts, support criminals and push sales to other states and unregulated markets.





The arc still has time to bend

by Imari Paris Jeffries


excerpts: 

We must be honest about the moral duplicity here. This is a nation that lectures the world on freedom while banning books that teach its children about the actual cost of freedom. A nation that funds bombs abroad while defunding equity at home. A nation that speaks of democracy in foreign tongues but forgets how to pronounce it in places like FergusonFlint, or Florida.

This is not merely a contradiction; it is a collapse. Because while America projects its might overseas, it wages a quieter war here at home. A war on memory. A war on truth. A war on justice itself.   

These two celebrations aren’t contradictions. They’re a mirror. They show us the whole story of who we’ve been and point toward who we still can become. They remind us that the American promise was never finished work, but something we shape with every act of courage, every step toward justice. A nation capable of forgiving itself by not forgetting, but by remembering more honestly, telling the full story, and making whole what was broken. 

The recent passage of the federal One Big Beautiful Bill Act deepens the moral fault lines Dr. King warned us about.

Signed on July 4, the bill amounts to a sweeping rollback of civil rights protections masquerading as legislative reform—codifying indifference at the highest level. It slashes over $1 trillion from Medicaid, imposes strict work requirements on SNAP recipients up to age 64, and phases out clean energy credits, while simultaneously funneling historic levels of funding into ICE enforcement and military expansion.  



The urgency of tackling health care affordability

by Sarah Iselin


excerpt: 


OUR STATE has a chance to make big changes in our health care system right now – the kind of transformation that can only come about in a crisis.  

There’s no question we’re in a critical moment. The new federal tax and spending bill is likely to pose extraordinary challenges to our hospitals, health plans, and ultimately, many of our neighbors in the Commonwealth who will need health care in the years to come.  



DONATE

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

My Message to Trump and Fox…

  My Message to Trump and Fox… Ben Meiselas and MeidasTouch Network Dec 5 By Ben Meiselas You both started this week by attacking Meidas. It...