TECH SUPPORT — Even before today’s arrest of a suspect in Tuesday’s Brooklyn subway shooting, NYC Mayor Eric Adams was talking about how new technologies could improve security in the nation’s busiest transit system. To go over the promise and the challenges of installing new security measures, Nightly spoke with New York city hall reporter Joe Anuta over Slack. This conversation has been edited. Everyone knows the New York City subway system is big. Not to start off like a bad joke book, but, well, how big is it? It’s massive. There are about 470 stops throughout the five boroughs. If you were to ride to every one, as people attempt to do from time to time, it would take more than 20 hours. And while it’s located entirely within New York City, it is actually controlled by the state government. Doesn’t New York City, or New York State, already use technology to bolster security in the subway? Cutting-edge security — or cutting-edge anything for that matter — is not typically associated with the city’s antiquated subway system. But the head of the transit system said today there are 10,000 cameras throughout the network of stations, which he noted was a substantial increase from years before. Otherwise, safety efforts have been pretty analog: Commuters have been subject to random bag searches by the NYPD since 2005, and more recently, Mayor Adams has talked extensively about beefing up the police presence underground, even before Tuesday’s attack. Adams said he would look to deploy high-tech gun detection technology, but not traditional metal detectors. How would this new system work? We don’t know exactly what the mayor has in mind yet. But he talked broadly this morning about a system that could scan commuters for guns, in many cases without them knowing. This is part of a broader push from his administration to explore more technological policing tools, such as facial recognition, that has alarmed several civil rights groups. In this case, the concern from critics is that these detection systems tend to return a lot of false positives, which could give police officers a pretext to stop and search a broad group of commuters. So critics say the new systems cited by Adams could end up infringing on the rights of New Yorkers without providing a meaningful increase in safety. Does City Hall have data that supports the effectiveness of these new systems? I think it’s too early to say anything about the efficacy of the systems, since we don't know exactly what the mayor has in mind. But this technology has already won over NYPD higher-ups, according to what Adams said this morning, and it's going to be rolled out in a pilot program soon — so we might not have to wait long. Critics will have very limited means to push back, because the mayor enjoys strong powers to run the city as he sees fit. I would imagine, if opponents truly believe these systems infringe upon the rights of New Yorkers, they will have to take their case to the courts. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com . Or contact tonight’s author at tweyant@politico.com, or on Twitter at @tweyant.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.