THE CONVERSATIONS THAT DROVE THE CONVERSATION — There were two conversations in Washington about Ukraine this week about, well, two conversations: Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy’s impassioned speech to Congress, and President Joe Biden’s long chat today with Chinese President Xi Jingping. Leaders spoke across time zones and oceans to try to express their positions and find room to end, or perhaps win, a war. But where did these talks lead, if anywhere? Are there off-ramps emerging in Moscow and Kyiv? To try to glean what comes, Nightly chatted over Slack with world and national security editor Ben Pauker. The conversation has been lightly edited. How do we see these two conversations affecting the Ukraine crisis, if at all? The two talks couldn’t have been more different. Zelenskyy, dressed in his army greens, gave a tight, 14-minute address to Congress from his secret bunker, asking for more weapons, more support, and more airpower. The Biden administration met the call, offering up another $800 million in military aid, including more missiles and (for the first time) armed drones. The Xi talks, which reportedly lasted two hours this morning, were Biden’s attempt to pry China away from supporting Russia’s invasion — or at least get them to put some rhetorical pressure on Putin. Where does it all go from here? The West is now flooding Ukraine with weapons and attention. The truth is that it’s to China’s strategic advantage to have the U.S. worried about Europe and not the Pacific. How much more is the U.S. able to do for Ukraine without overly antagonizing Russia? And will congressional pressure push Biden to do more? It’s been decades since the phrase “nuclear war” seemed to be on everyone’s lips. There’s real concern in Washington that Putin could do something even more reckless than start a land war in Europe: He has an enormous stockpile of “tactical” nukes and a military doctrine that could allow for their use if the Russian offensive stalls out. Some members of Congress are pushing Biden to do more than just throw money at a proxy war, but that’s an emotional response with dangerous consequences. The White House is looking at the bigger picture of strategic U.S. interests and the very real threat of nuclear escalation. Is there any sense of the White House trying to help Putin find a way out of the conflict? There’s lots of talks of peace negotiations, but no indication yet that the Kremlin is interested in anything other than the comprehensive destruction of Ukraine’s government. Several players have quietly offered themselves up as possible mediators (Israel, China, John Cena), but the reality is that the opposing sides are too far apart on what would be the terms of an acceptable peace. Sadly, I think it’s still too early. Russia’s invasion may not be going well according to Twitter, but Putin has more time and more cards to play before he’ll take a deal. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight’s author at tweyant@politico.com, or on Twitter at @tweyant.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.