THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK V. DONALD J. TRUMP — One of the most consequential trials in American history kicks off Monday. And among former President Donald Trump’s legal cases, it could be the only criminal trial that is resolved by November. It’s also set to be complex, relying on untested legal theories — largely because the entire situation is new: Never before has an American president or former president gone to trial in a criminal case, and never before has an American president been formally accused of paying hush money. In contrast to other criminal indictments concerning Trump’s efforts to overturn an election and his handling of classified documents, this one rests on whether the former president falsified business records. You have questions? At Nightly, we have answers, with some help from our friends around the newsroom. And every Friday while the trial is in session, we’ll have analysis of the past week’s high and low points and a peek at the week to come. The basics: Next week, in a grim Manhattan courthouse, prosecutors will attempt to prove that Trump falsified business records in connection with a payoff to Stormy Daniels, a porn star who claimed she had a sexual encounter with him. By buying Daniels’ silence, the payoff avoided a possible sex scandal in the final weeks of the 2016 presidential campaign. Michael Cohen, Trump’s personal attorney and “fixer” at the time, paid $130,000 to Daniels in October 2016, according to prosecutors. Then, while in the White House, Trump reimbursed Cohen in a series of installment payments processed by Trump’s company. Prosecutors say Trump fraudulently disguised those installments as corporate legal expenses in violation of New York law. The 42 questions on the juror questionnaire : Among them : Without telling us your address, in what neighborhood do you live? Do you listen to or watch podcasts? If so, which ones? Do you have any strong opinions or firmly held beliefs about former President Donald Trump, or the fact that he is a current candidate for president that would interfere with your ability to be a fair and impartial juror? The potential witness list: On Thursday, NBC News obtained a potential witness list for the trial . In addition to Cohen and Daniels, it includes Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model who also alleges she had an extramarital affair with Trump and was paid off. In addition, prosecutors could call Keith Davidson, the attorney who represented Daniels and McDougal when the payments were made. Then there’s Dylan Howard and David Pecker, the former editor-in-chief of the National Inquirer and the former CEO of American Media, respectively; Howard and Pecker were allegedly responsible for paying McDougal a six-figure sum for the rights to her story so that they could then not publish it in a “catch and kill” tactic. Finally, there’s Hope Hicks and potentially others from the Trump administration and campaign who had knowledge of the situation. The view from a star witness : Michael Cohen, the former Trump attorney and fixer who paid Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about her alleged affair with Trump, says Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case is stronger than analysts believe . How Donald Trump gets special treatment in the legal system : The former president rails against a “two-tiered system of justice.” But he’s the one benefiting from it. Over the past year, in ways large and small, in criminal cases and civil ones, Trump has consistently been given more freedom and more privileges than virtually any other defendant in his shoes . Why Trump could lose — and why he could win: Trump faces an uphill battle to avoid conviction in the case . Most criminal defendants who go to trial end up being convicted. Trump himself is also incredibly unpopular in Manhattan, and his courtroom antics in recent months have probably not endeared him to many prospective jurors in the borough. Worse still for the former president, Judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over the trial, significantly narrowed Trump’s potential lines of defense in a series of pretrial rulings on legal and evidentiary issues. But Trump and his lawyers still have two robust defense strategies — first, look for the defense to take a wrecking ball to Michael Cohen in the hopes of taking down the whole case with him. Cohen has lied to Congress, committed perjury in connection with a guilty plea, and fashioned himself as a media commentator, all of which could damage his credibility in the eyes of the jury. Then there’s another, less explored route that Trump’s team could try: asking the judge to give the jury the option of convicting him on lesser, misdemeanor offenses instead of the felony counts that have actually been brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his team of prosecutors. A person familiar with Trump’s legal strategy told me that some of Trump’s lawyers have quietly — albeit tentatively — considered that option in the run-up to the trial. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com . Or contact tonight’s author at cmahtesian@politico.com and cmchugh@politico.com or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @PoliticoCharlie and @calder_mchugh .
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.