NEW FRONTIER — Gun control supporters won a victory this week as the Supreme Court left New York’s newest gun law in place for now. But going forward, they’re looking toward voters — not legislatures — in their quest to put stricter gun ownership and safety measures on the books. Gun control advocates have watched carefully as advocates scored victories even in very conservative states when they put Medicaid expansion or protecting abortion directly on the ballot. In November, a groundbreaking gun safety measure passed in Oregon. Now the idea of putting gun control on the ballot in 2024 is surfacing in several states. “We’re starting to have those conversations” with activists across the country, said Rev. Mark Knutson, a leader of Lift Every Voice, a faith-based community coalition that propelled the Oregon measure. “I think it’s going to build.” Oregon’s Measure 114 requires training and a permit to purchase a firearm and bans magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. It also tightens background checks. It faces legislative obstacles and ongoing legal challenges — there’s no guarantee the full measure will be implemented. But the vote was still an earthquake in the gun safety world, even if it didn’t get that much national attention given everything else going on in the November congressional elections. Yes, Oregon is blue — though not so blue that its Democratic-controlled legislature had ever enacted laws like Measure 114. The shock and grief after Uvalde and Buffalo galvanized people. Thomas Wheatley, senior adviser at the Oregon Alliance for Gun Safety, said the signature drive to get it on the ballot had been “slow going in the winter and early spring and then Uvalde and Buffalo happened and there was this monumental outpouring of anguish and anger from people all from all walks of life from all across the state.” “We had volunteers aged 11 to 95,” said Knutson. Earlier initiatives had fizzled out. This one made it. Ballot initiatives are cumbersome, but the activists in Oregon hope the November vote emboldens their state lawmakers to pass legislation without being afraid of a National Rifle Association-fueled political backlash. They said ballot initiatives validate all those polls over the years that show people — even people who put conservative lawmakers in state government — do want more gun regulation. Just like people in other states — even people who voted for conservatives in their state legislatures — wanted to expand Medicaid and preserve abortion rights. “People want common sense gun safety — we’ve proven that in three separate ballot measures here in Washington [State],” said Kristen Ellingboe, communications director for the state’s Alliance for Gun Responsibility, which is also hearing from activists across the country. Washington state passed gun measures in 2014, 16, and 18 — tightening background checks, adding “red flag” laws, and raising the age to purchase a semi-automatic assault rifle. Since then, the legislature has taken up gun measures that they had shunned before. A few other states have passed a handful of measures in recent years, though some were blocked by courts. Major national gun safety groups endorsed Oregon’s measure 14, but they haven’t taken the lead in mounting such initiatives. Their focus is still on getting bills through state legislatures — and getting more people elected to those state legislatures who will vote for them. They aren’t hostile to voter initiatives, they just don’t think it’s the best vehicle. Sean Holihan, the state legislative director of the gun safety group Giffords, called them “unwieldy, unpredictable things” — in addition to being time-consuming, expensive and likely to be caught up in court battles. And it’s easy for opponents, including powerful groups like the NRA, to demonize them. But the grass roots may have different ideas, given what some of the state-based activists are hearing, especially in gun-friendly states that are highly unlikely to pass gun laws. And the backdrop of the Medicaid and abortion fights encourages them. Nobody thought that Idaho and Utah would vote for an Obamacare program for poor people, or that Kansans would flock to vote for abortion rights. This early interest in gun referenda could fizzle out. Or, by 2024, it could become a trend. “It won’t work everywhere but it could work in more states where legislation couldn’t go through,” said Lisa Geller, state affairs adviser for the Center for Gun Violence Solutions at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “I don’t know who is next – but I think someone will be.” Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com . Or contact tonight’s author on Twitter at @JoanneKenen . Programming Note: We’ll be off this Monday for Martin Luther King Jr. Day but will be back in your inboxes on Tuesday, Jan. 17.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.