RED LINE — For two years, Poltava had been a relative safe haven. More than a hundred miles from the front lines, the leafy Ukrainian city had been spared much of the destruction being wrought on communities closer to the fighting — until a Russian missile slammed into a hospital last week, killing at least 58 people and injuring hundreds more. Now, days on from one of the deadliest strikes since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, we could be witnessing an inflection point: Moscow is threatening the West with total war if it allows Ukraine to hit back. With speculation growing that the U.S. could relax a ban on Western weapons being used to strike targets inside Russia, President Vladimir Putin warned the move “will mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries are fighting Russia.” Kyiv has for months wanted the U.S. to lift a ban on using donated missiles to take out targets across the border — restrictions which Washington had imposed in an apparent effort to avoid ‘escalation,’ such as Moscow resorting to using nuclear weapons or more directly confronting the West. Earlier this week, after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy urged Washington to give the green light for cross-border missile strikes, President Joe Biden said that officials were “working that out right now.” On a visit to Ukraine today, Estonian President Alar Kalis branded the rules “artificial and pointless,” when Iran and North Korea are supplying weapons to the Kremlin without restrictions. Britain’s new prime minister, Sir Keir Starmer, also used a visit to the U.S. to raise the issue, with London having previously sought permission for Ukraine to use its powerful Storm Shadow rockets inside Russia — a move the White House is yet to support. A change in policy could transform Kyiv’s capabilities. Jade McGlynn, a conflict researcher at King’s College London, told Nightly that letting Ukraine strike Russian bases “would make it a much fairer fight by allowing them to stop the shooter, rather than just catch the bullet,” ensuring launch sites for Russian missiles, like the one that killed so many innocent people in Poltava, could be targeted. However, the Biden administration isn’t yet fully on board. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has cast doubt on the plan, insisting that no “one capacity is going to be decisive” in the war, and that Ukraine has been able to achieve results with other hardware like drones. But, with allies piling on the pressure and atrocities like the Poltava strike making headlines all too often, pressure is growing to let Ukraine do what it wants with its weapons. “Russia is a nuclear power, and it would be irresponsible to totally ignore that,” said Bradley Bowman, senior director of the Center on Military and Political Power at Washington’s hawkish Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former Republican Senate advisor. “But Putin has made threats along these lines before and his consistent strategy is to play into fears of escalation as a means to deprive Kyiv of the weapons and support it needs.” “Since February 24, 2022, we’ve seen over and over again the dynamic where Zelenskyy says I need this or that system and then we see a ‘no’ from the Biden administration, then we see a ‘maybe,’ then a ‘yes.’ And, as time passes, all that happens is Ukrainians die, Russia advances.” Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com . Or contact tonight’s author at ggavin@politico.eu or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @GabrielCSGavin .
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.