RSN: Greg Palast | No Car, No Vote: "Emergency" Georgia Registration Roadblock
28 November 20
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News
SERIOUS FUND-RAISING, HERE AND NOW - Reader Supported News is surviving and maintaining services in the worst economic environment our organization has ever seen. But just barely. Today we ask for the support of all RSN readers who can afford to give. This will be a good fund-raiser. Thanks to all in advance. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News
Sure, I'll make a donation!
Greg Palast | No Car, No Vote: "Emergency" Georgia Registration Roadblock
Greg Palast, Greg Palast's Website
Palast writes: "On Monday, Georgia's Board of Elections issued a directive that allows county election supervisors to block new registrations of voters who do not have a car registered in Georgia. I kid you not."
This is a new impediment to low-income, urban voters and students, groups that vote overwhelmingly Democratic, just prior to the January 5 run-off election for Georgia’s two US Senate seats.
The Board acted after Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger quietly sent out a notice on Sunday afternoon calling for an “emergency” change of rules.
Raffensperger convened a State Board of Elections “emergency” meeting just hours later, at 8am on Monday, in Atlanta. The Palast Investigations Fund team joined the Zoom meet along with the president of the Georgia NAACP and Helen Butler, head of the Georgia Coalition for a Peoples Agenda.
The Board announced that they did not have to vote on the rule—but could simply adopt it as a “guidance” directive which would have the same power to block registrations.
Columbia University law professor Barbara Arnwine told us the no-car no-vote “emergency” regulation “is a clear violation of the NVRA,” the National Voter Registration Act. Arnwine, dean of America’s voting rights lawyers and founder of the Transformative Justice Coalition, said she suspected the state’s change from a “rule” to a “guidance” is to try to get around the NVRA’s prohibition on rule changes within 90 days of an election. However, she said, that’s a trick which fails the smell test. “It’s in substance a change of rules.”
The “emergency” rule is supposed to stop voter fraud by those coming into Georgia just to vote in the run-off. So, Palast Investigative Fund Asst. Producer Terry Manpearl asked if the Sec. of State found even one single case of a non-Georgian voting, a serious crime, “And if so, have you arrested them?” They did not answer.
Technically, the state can’t stop Georgia citizens from voting because they don’t have a car. Rather, any registrar can “challenge” and thereby delay a voter’s registration until they have a hearing where they will be required to prove residence. This creates a huge impediment to new voters.
As a practical matter, a challenged car-less voter will be unlikely to vote in the January 5 run-off. Combining the holidays with Covid, it is hard to imagine that voters can complete the hearing process and get a decision in time to vote. And few challenged voters would be expected to put themselves through a court-like hearing.
The grounds for the challenge is that a new voter, having no auto registered in Georgia, may be a non-resident attempting to commit the felony crime of illegal registration. While there is no restriction on applying this to any new voter registrant, it appears, as Rev. Woodall notes, “The residency determination is only for those who’ve recently registered to vote by mail for the first time and need to prove their identity.”
This is Jim Crow all over again. The so-called ‘guidance’ directs registrars to check auto registrations and, at their discretion, challenge voters and force them to a hearing. It is effectively a poll tax – no car, no vote – combined with the old ‘literacy’ test game of Georgia’s past when, at the “discretion” of the registrar, white people were asked to name the president while Black citizens were asked to recite the Constitution. I’ve been investigating Georgia vote suppression techniques for seven years, and this is simply a variant of a trick they used before to block or attempt to block voters — including my daughter.
Reverend James Woodall, President of the Georgia NAACP, told the Board of Elections that the rule would lead to, “disenfranchisement of students, seniors and retirees that often live in assisted home facilities. To suggest that newly registered voters could possibly be frauds is very dangerous.”
Georgia State University professor Liz Throop stated, “Secretary [Brad] Raffensperger has recently and repeatedly assured the media that he is a Republican and he hopes Republican candidates succeed in current elections. We all know which party [this rule] favors: older, wealthier, better established Georgia. The car-less, the young and the poor, are most likely to be disadvantaged.”
Palast team attorneys are reviewing the legal options to protect voters. Palast and Butler successfully sued Georgia’s Secretary of State earlier this year obtaining a federal court ruling requiring the state to open its secret correspondence on racially-biased vote roll purges.
READ MORE
Joe Biden. (photo: Mike Blake/Reuters)
ALSO SEE: Federal Appeals Court Throws Out
Trump Election Lawsuit in Pennsylvania
Biden Gains Votes in Recount of Milwaukee County Requested by Trump
Samira Said, CNN
Said writes: "President-elect Joe Biden saw a small net gain in votes as Milwaukee County, Wisconsin's largest, certified its presidential general election results Friday after a recount requested by the Trump campaign."
READ MORE
A demonstrator holds a sign with the image of Breonna Taylor. (photo: Jason Connolly/AFP/Getty Images
Movement to Limit Police Raids Looks Beyond 'No-Knock' Warrants
Martin Kaste, NPR
Kaste writes: "'No-knock' search warrants, which allow police to force their way into a home with the element of surprise, have attracted criticism since the height of the 'war on drugs' in the 1980s and 90s."
READ MORE
Demonstrators outside the company headquarters of Purdue Pharma, owned by the Sackler family, in Stamford, Connecticut, on Thursday. (photo: Erik McGregor/LightRocket/Getty Images)
McKinsey Suggested Purdue Pharma Offer a Rebate for Each OxyContin Overdose
Walt Bogdanich and Michael Forsythe, The New York Times
Excerpt: "When Purdue Pharma agreed last month to plead guilty to criminal charges involving OxyContin, the Justice Department noted the role an unidentified consulting company had played in driving sales of the addictive painkiller even as public outrage grew over widespread overdoses."
Court filings reveal consultants’ talk of a records purge during the opioid crisis, and shed new light on sales advice given to the billionaire Sackler family and their drug company, Purdue Pharma.
Documents released last week in a federal bankruptcy court in New York show that the adviser was McKinsey & Company, the world’s most prestigious consulting firm. The 160 pages include emails and slides revealing new details about McKinsey’s advice to the Sackler family, Purdue’s billionaire owners, and the firm’s now notorious plan to “turbocharge” OxyContin sales at a time when opioid abuse had already killed hundreds of thousands of Americans.
In a 2017 presentation, according to the records, which were filed in court on behalf of multiple state attorneys general, McKinsey laid out several options to shore up sales. One was to give Purdue’s distributors a rebate for every OxyContin overdose attributable to pills they sold.
READ MORE
Donald Trump. (photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Trump Moves to Strip Job Protections From White House Budget Analysts as He Races to Transform Civil Service
Lisa Rein, The Washington Post
Rein writes: "The outgoing Trump administration is racing to enact the biggest change to the federal civil service in generations, reclassifying career employees at key agencies to strip their job protections and leave them open to being fired before Joe Biden takes office."
READ MORE
A protest in Chile. (photo: BBC)
Chile: Police Quell New Protests Demanding Piñera Step Down
teleSUR
Excerpt: "On Friday, Chilean police used force against thousands of demonstrators who were trying to approach the Palacio de la Moneda, the seat of the national government, to demand the resignation of President Sebastián Piñera as well as the freedom of those detained during the social unrest that rocked the South American country in October 2019."
READ MORE
Born into a dying world? Children at a climate protest. (photo: Isopix/Rex/Shutterstock
Study: Climate 'Apocalypse' Fears Stopping People Having Children
Damian Carrington, Guardian UK
Carrington writes: "People worried about the climate crisis are deciding not to have children because of fears that their offspring would have to struggle through a climate apocalypse, according to the first academic study of the issue."
Survey of 600 people finds some parents regret having offspring for same reason
The researchers surveyed 600 people aged 27 to 45 who were already factoring climate concerns into their reproductive choices and found 96% were very or extremely concerned about the wellbeing of their potential future children in a climate-changed world. One 27-year-old woman said: “I feel like I can’t in good conscience bring a child into this world and force them to try and survive what may be apocalyptic conditions.”
These views were based on very pessimistic assessments of the impact of global heating on the world, the researchers said. One respondent, for example, said it would “rival world war one in its sheer terror”. The research also found that some people who were already parents expressed regret over having their children.
Having a child also potentially means that person going on to produce a lifetime of carbon emissions that contribute to the climate emergency, but only 60% of those surveyed were very concerned about this carbon footprint.
“The fears about the carbon footprint of having kids tended to be abstract and dry,” said Matthew Schneider-Mayerson, of Yale-NUS College in Singapore, who led the study. “But the fears about the lives of existing or potential children were really deep and emotional. It was often heartbreaking to pore through the responses – a lot of people really poured their hearts out.”
The number of people factoring climate change into their reproductive plans was likely to grow, Schneider-Mayerson said, as the impacts of global heating became more obvious. “To address this, we really need to act immediately to address the root cause, which is climate change itself,” he said.
The study, published in the journal Climatic Change, found no statistically significant difference between the views of women and men, though women made up three-quarters of respondents. A 31-year-old woman said: “Climate change is the sole factor for me in deciding not to have biological children. I don’t want to birth children into a dying world [though] I dearly want to be a mother.”
The researchers found that 6% of parents confessed to feeling some remorse about having children. A 40-year-old mother said: “I regret having my kids because I am terrified that they will be facing the end of the world due to climate change.”
Schneider-Mayerson said: “I was surprised – for parents, this is an extremely difficult statement to make.”
The study is the first peer-reviewed academic study of the issue and analysed a large group of concerned people. The survey was done anonymously so people could express themselves freely.
“It is an unprecedented window into the way that [some people] are thinking and feeling about what many consider to be the most important decision in their lives,” said Schneider-Mayerson.
Other findings were that younger people were more concerned about the climate impacts their children would experience than older respondents, and that adoption was seen as a potential alternative to having biological children.
The study indicated that climate-related fears for their children’s lives were rooted in a deeply pessimistic view of the future. Of the 400 respondents who offered a vision of the future, 92.3% were negative, 5.6% were mixed or neutral, and just 0.6% were positive.
One 42-year-old father wrote that the world in 2050 would be “a hot-house hell, with wars over limited resources, collapsing civilisation, failing agriculture, rising seas, melting glaciers, starvation, droughts, floods, mudslides and widespread devastation.” Schneider-Mayerson said he thought the pessimistic views held were all within the range of possibilities, if not necessarily the most likely outcome.
However, he said further research was needed on a more diverse group of people and in other parts of the world. The self-selecting group in the study all lived in the US and were largely white, more highly educated and liberal.
Previously, opinion polls of the general public indicated people were connecting the climate crisis and reproduction, with one poll in 2020 finding that among 18- to 44-year-old US citizens without children, 14% cited climate change as a “major reason” for not having children. In 2019, scores of women in the UK said they were starting a “birth strike” until the climate crisis was resolved.
Seth Wynes, of Concordia University in Canada, whose 2017 study found having one less child was the greatest impact individuals can have in fighting climate change, said the researchers had properly stressed that the sample was not representative of all Americans. But he said the distress over the decision to have children made sense. “Climate change is already affecting our world in frightening ways and so it’s certainly reasonable to account for the climate crisis when thinking about the future of one’s family.
“As climate change continues to worsen, it is important to understand how perceptions of the future can change the way everyday people plan their lives,” Wynes said. “This study is an initial step in growing that understanding.”
There is also growing evidence of climate anxiety affecting mental health and earlier in 2020 more than 1,000 clinical psychologists signed an open letter warning of “acute trauma on a global scale”. Last week, a survey revealed that more than half of child and adolescent psychiatrists in England were seeing patients distressed about the state of the environment.
READ MORE
Contribute to RSN
Update My Monthly Donation
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.