17 May 20
At some point, and perhaps now, the conditions caused by the Coronavirus Pandemic are going to impact our ability to raise enough money to keep RSN operational.
People are hurting and people are the ones sustaining RSN. That’s a bad combination. The good news is that we have a big strong community. That is a deep and precious resource.
Do what you can.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
Founder, Reader Supported News
If you would prefer to send a check:
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611
Reader Supported News
PO Box 2043
Citrus Hts, CA 95611
17 May 20
Garrison Keillor | The News from Manhattan: Thursday, May 13, 2020
Garrison Keillor, Garrison Keillor's Website
Keillor writes: "The White House is a joke and the reporters in the briefing room may as well be writing about squirrels in the park."
READ MORE
Garrison Keillor, Garrison Keillor's Website
Keillor writes: "The White House is a joke and the reporters in the briefing room may as well be writing about squirrels in the park."
READ MORE
U.S. state department inspector general Steve Linick departs after briefing House and Senate Intelligence committees at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S. October 2, 2019. (photo: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)
Trump's Firing of State Department Watchdog May Be 'Unlawful,' Pelosi Says
Sarah N. Lynch and Doina Chiacu, Reuters
Excerpt: "U.S. President Donald Trump's firing of the State Department's top internal watchdog "could be unlawful" if it was intended to retaliate against one of his investigations, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Sunday."
Sarah N. Lynch and Doina Chiacu, Reuters
Excerpt: "U.S. President Donald Trump's firing of the State Department's top internal watchdog "could be unlawful" if it was intended to retaliate against one of his investigations, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Sunday."
EXCERPT:
In April, Trump removed a top coronavirus watchdog, Glenn Fine, who was to oversee the government’s financial relief response to the pandemic.
He also notified Congress that he was firing the inspector general of the U.S. intelligence community, Michael Atkinson, who was involved in triggering the impeachment investigation.
After Atkinson’s firing, a bipartisan group of senators, including Republicans Charles Grassley, Susan Collins and Mitt Romney, called on Trump to provide a detailed written explanation for his decision.
Then earlier this month, Trump ousted Christi Grimm, who led the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, after accusing her of having produced a “fake dossier” on American hospitals suffering shortages on the frontlines of the coronavirus outbreak.
Experts say the pattern threatens the independent oversight function that inspectors general provide, particularly if watchdogs feel pressure to do the president’s political bidding or risk being fired for refusing.
The system itself is now “weakening to the point of ineffectiveness,” said Dan Meyer, the executive director of Intelligence Community Whistleblowing and Source Protection.
Some Republicans in Congress have rushed to defend Trump’s decision to oust Linick.
In an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson said he felt “not all inspector generals are created equal” and noted they “serve at the pleasure of the president.”
Customers wear face masks to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus as they line up to enter a Costco Wholesale store April 16, 2020 in Wheaton, Maryland. (photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
"Immune to Evidence": How Dangerous Coronavirus Conspiracies Spread
Marshall Allen, ProPublica
Allen writes: "Conspiratorial videos and websites about COVID-19 are going viral. Here's how one of the authors of 'The Conspiracy Theory Handbook' says you can fight back."
READ MORE
Marshall Allen, ProPublica
Allen writes: "Conspiratorial videos and websites about COVID-19 are going viral. Here's how one of the authors of 'The Conspiracy Theory Handbook' says you can fight back."
READ MORE
'Belly of the Beast.' (photo: Human Rights Watch Film Festival)
Inside America's Horrifying Modern-Day Eugenics Movement
Cassie Da Costa, The Daily Beast
Da Costa writes: "In the U.S., many regular people still believe in eugenics, particularly when it comes to the country's enormous incarcerated population, and especially when those people are poor black women."
Cassie Da Costa, The Daily Beast
Da Costa writes: "In the U.S., many regular people still believe in eugenics, particularly when it comes to the country's enormous incarcerated population, and especially when those people are poor black women."
EXCERPTS:
The documentary follows the case of Kelli McDonald, a black mother who was told she had cysts and needed surgery while incarcerated, only to discover, over a year later and after months of menopausal symptoms and extreme weight loss at the age of 24, that she had been given a hysterectomy (McDonald’s doctors never told her they had performed a hysterectomy on her). Risking retaliation, McDonald decided to speak out even while she was still in jail and teamed up with the prison abolition legal aid organization Justice Now, founded by attorney Cynthia Chandler, to find justice. Belly of the Beast is about the freedom work McDonald, Chandler, and the Justice Now team—whose board members are all currently incarcerated women—do against all odds in the service of female survivors of all kinds of violence, not just at home but from the state.
In the documentary, Chandler points out that 92 percent of incarcerated women worldwide are survivors of domestic violence and childhood abuse (the figure has been reported as somewhere between 70 and 90 percent), and a portion of these women are even incarcerated for defending themselves against their abusers. Then, after experiencing this violence at home, for years, decades, or even the remainder of their lives, these women are abused again and again by a state-designed operation. With its Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California, a state that often receives liberal praise and conservative ire for its progressive image, is indeed home to one of the most brutally violent organizations operating in the country today.
It’s not just McDonald, but likely hundreds of women (at minimum) in the California corrections system alone who have been forcibly sterilized and whose names were never recorded by administrators. Belly of the Beast resurfaces not only the inhumanity of what we call “rehabilitation” but also of the many online and in-real-life commenters who are extremely satisfied by their exclusive, race- and class-determined rights.
Prosecutors say the incident occurred after a dispute at a beauty supplies store. (photo: Tomas Ovalle/EPA)
Missouri Police Officers Indicted After Video Emerges of Alleged Assault on Black Trans Woman
Associated Press
Excerpt: "Two Kansas City police officers face assault charges for allegedly slamming a transgender woman's face into a concrete sidewalk during an arrest that was captured on video."
Associated Press
Excerpt: "Two Kansas City police officers face assault charges for allegedly slamming a transgender woman's face into a concrete sidewalk during an arrest that was captured on video."
EXCERPTS:
A grand jury in Missouri indicted Matthew Brummett, 37, and Charles Prichard, 47, on one misdemeanor charge each of fourth-degree assault related to the encounter, the Jackson county prosecutor’s office announced on Friday.
The video, recorded by a passerby outside a beauty supply store on 24 May last year, shows the officers kneeing the woman in the face, torso and ribs and forcing her arms over her head while handcuffed. The woman was black; the officers are white.
Prosecutors said police arrested Hill after she got into a dispute with someone at the beauty supply store. Both she and the store’s owner called 911, and the owner asked officers to remove Hill. The officers said Hill was resisting arrest when they took her to the ground outside the store. Hill was ticketed for trespassing, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest and possession of drug paraphernalia.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, speaks Sunday during a swearing-in ceremony of his new unity government with election rival Benny Gantz, at the Knesset, Israel's parliament, in Jerusalem, Sunday, May 17, 2020. (photo: Adina Valman/AP)
After Three Elections and Political Deadlock, Israel Swears in New Government
Ruth Eglash, The Washington Post
Eglash writes: "Israel's new government, headed once again by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was sworn into office on Sunday, ending nearly a year and a half of political stalemate involving three stormy elections and multiple rounds of coalition negotiations."
READ MORE
Ruth Eglash, The Washington Post
Eglash writes: "Israel's new government, headed once again by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was sworn into office on Sunday, ending nearly a year and a half of political stalemate involving three stormy elections and multiple rounds of coalition negotiations."
READ MORE
Bats. (photo: Getty Images)
Bats Are Not Our Enemies
Timothy Treuer, Ricardo Rocha and Cara Brook, Scientific American
Excerpt: "Bats get a bad rap. From horror films to tabloid pages to Halloween, media and cultural depictions of our planet's only volant, or flying, mammals have long generated and reinforced unfounded fear."
Timothy Treuer, Ricardo Rocha and Cara Brook, Scientific American
Excerpt: "Bats get a bad rap. From horror films to tabloid pages to Halloween, media and cultural depictions of our planet's only volant, or flying, mammals have long generated and reinforced unfounded fear."
The viruses they carry spill over into humans mostly when we encroach on their territory or drag them into ours—and bats do great good as well
Their evident role as original source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that produced the COVID-19 epidemic has exacerbated their unfortunate public image and even led to calls and active measures to cull or harass bat populations.
Such hostile attitudes make it harder to conserve bats and thereby safeguard the many critical benefits they provide us. What’s more, persecuting bats because of the diseases they harbor could easily backfire.
Before getting into that, let’s back up for a second.
THE TRUTH ABOUT BATS AND DISEASE
The kernel of truth regarding bats and disease is that the former do host an unusual variety of the latter, including viruses that can be deadly when they spill into the lives of other mammals like us. Other authors have thoughtfully covered the direct and indirect role bats played in the emergence of the likes of Ebola, Nipah and SARS. Rather than rehashing that here, we’ll just point out that recent research has suggested a reason why bats have been the source of an eyebrow-raising number of disease outbreaks. In short, the unique stress of flight may have supercharged bats’ ability to tolerate aggressive immune responses to certain pathogens, triggering the co-evolution of virulent viruses. The more pedestrian immune systems of earthbound mammals struggle to cope when those bad boy virions enter their system.
But before throwing bats out with the bathwater on the grounds of disease risk, we must consider the rich range of benefits they provide us, including several ways they keep us healthy. Bats help regenerate our forests and provide us with fertilizer. They pollinate our food plants, from mangos to agave, in total more than 300 species of crops. They also gobble up so many insect pests in fields of cacao, cotton, corn and countless other cultivated species that without them we’d see more than $3.7 billion per year in lost production in North America alone. These hungry mouths are particularly important in less economically developed countries, where a number of different species offer free-of-charge pest control services by feasting on multiple agricultural pests each.
Munching moths and other insects indirectly improves our health. The loss of bats following the spread of white-nose syndrome in the United States led to a measurable rise in infant morbidity and mortality in agricultural regions as toxic pesticide use rose to compensate for missing insectivores. Bats also eat disease-spreading nasties like mosquitoes, including the growing number of malaria-spreading Anopheles that have evolved resistance to insecticides.
Setting all that aside, culling or otherwise directly harming bats in an attempt to tamp down the risk of a future SARS or Ebola is based on faulty assumptions and may paradoxically lead to higher disease risk. Culling vampire bats to prevent rabies in Peru failed to contain the disease and may have disproportionately killed the bats that were least likely to spread the infection. In Uganda, an attempt to wipe out a large colony of Egyptian fruit bats led to a far higher incidence of Marburg virus when the site was recolonized by more susceptible individuals. Even stressing bats may lead to higher risk of disease transmission; such is the case with Hendra virus in Australian little red flying foxes.
In March, officials in Indonesia ordered the culling of captive bats in markets. There are rumors of officials in Rwanda blasting straw-colored fruit bat colonies with a firehose. These actions will have no impact on their stated purpose of helping address the current outbreak.
We are still perfecting the recipe for heading off the next zoonotic pandemic. It certainly includes a heaping portion of enhanced disease surveillance and a healthy dollop of improved public health infrastructure. Less obvious though, is the mélange of ingredients united in their requirement that we stop treating bats as some sort of sinister “other.”
First, we need a range of targeted bat conservation efforts. Spillovers happen when we encroach into their world or drag them into ours. When inadequate forest resources led Pteropus fruit bats in Bangladesh to visit date palm trees, people unwittingly drank Nipah virus along with their customary raw date palm sap. More commonly, bat viruses hop into living stepping-stones including pigs (Nipah virus), horses (Hendra virus) or camels (MERS-related coronavirus). In their native habitats, bats are very unlikely to shed these viruses into dense concentrations of domesticated animals.
With their homes in good shape, there is less need for bats to spend time in ours. Large-scale habitat restoration could decrease problematic contact between bats and people or our domesticated animals, a side perk of global reforestation efforts. We may even be able to take targeted steps like establishing artificial bat roosts and native fruit trees in appropriate settings, reducing dangerous contact while still retaining the valuable services bats provide us. Building support for all these efforts, however, is vastly more difficult if we continue demonizing bats.
More empathy for bats could bolster efforts to limit or even outright end the wildlife trade, since it’s another common way in which bats are forced into direct or indirect contact with people. Indeed, a live-animal market in Wuhan was the apparent epicenter of the early weeks of the outbreak. The fact that bats may not have been sold there illustrates the need to crack down broadly against the commercial sale of nondomesticated creatures, given the diversity of animals that can be intermediary and amplifying hosts.
At the very least, we need commonsense constraints on the most dangerous practices (such as ending the trade of live wild animals; stopping the housing of large numbers of different species in close quarters; and preventing contact between captive animals and wild bats). Thankfully, China seems to be stepping up to the plate, but preventing a black market requires curbing demand for wildlife products, a task made that much easier by better bat public relations.
Staying safe also demands continued effort to illuminate the distribution, habitat associations and population trends of the lion’s share of the 1,400 recognized bat species, not to mention the diseases they harbor. Information is particularly limited in many of the most biodiverse areas of the planet, where new emerging infectious diseases are more likely to originate. Researchers struggle to fund expeditions to collect this basic natural history data when the public’s attitude to bats is more fear and loathing than respect and admiration.
Fortunately, we have some new tools at our disposal. Modern genome sequencing methods have begun prying open a window into the previously mysterious realm of bat viromes. Modern-day swashbuckling explorers are scaling cliffs in Madagascar and scouring caves in Sierra Leone to collect samples of all sorts of bodily fluids and solids from bats, sequencing the genetic material from the viruses contained within. Some are tracking how the risk of disease tracks with the seasons, reproductive cycles and climate, while others are dusting off clinical samples from patients that presented with high fever but went undiagnosed for known diseases. (Unfortunately, one of the key groups conducting this type of research recently had its funding cut by the current administration.)
Though we laud our colleagues’ efforts and attempt to walk the walk with our own research initiatives, it is also important to remember that the way we present our science matters too. Negative media representations of bats can arise directly from the framing of academic journal articles. We scientists must emphasize the good alongside the risk, and consistently drive home the message that it’s only by knowing, accepting and even celebrating bats that we can achieve the healthiest possible future.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.