Several years ago, I had an election case that was dragging on and on. Sensing my impatience, the judge said, “Mr. Elias, the court would rather get it right than fast.” I responded that given the delay, getting the case over fast was no longer an option, so the court should focus on the right outcome.
It has been more than eight months since the Supreme Court began hearing 61 cases this term. Yet, with less than two weeks until the end of June, a third remain undecided. Most notable among those are two cases that bear directly on whether Donald Trump will face federal criminal trials that could end in incarceration.
Already one of those cases, involving Trump’s claim of absolute immunity, has resulted in a delay of his Washington, D.C. federal criminal trial past the November election. Justice delayed is justice denied.
This week I spotlight how timing affects the most important democracy news of the last week.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.