Fighting for gender justice in the courts, in public policy, and in our society. |
The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide whether emergency abortion care can be singled out and excluded from a federal law that requires hospitals to provide emergency care to all who need it. The truth is pregnancy can be a dangerous health condition and more than half of pregnant people seek emergency treatment at some point during their pregnancy, and sometimes abortion care may be necessary to prevent serious jeopardy to their health or their life. The Supreme Court's decision will determine whether states across the country can ban abortion even in these circumstances—this is just another part of the larger extremist-led strategy to ban abortion nationwide. Make a donation now to power the fight for accessible health care and a better future for all. The cases in front of the Court are Idaho v. U.S. and Moyle v. U.S. and concern the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA)—a crucial federal law that guarantees that all people nationwide who go to an emergency room at virtually any hospital in the country, with an emergency condition will be treated.For nearly 40 years, EMTALA has been a pillar of ensuring access to health- and life-saving care for all individuals in times of health care emergencies. But anti-abortion extremists want to *exclude* pregnant people from this protection, and force doctors to turn away patients suffering emergency pregnancy complications, including infection, sepsis, hemorrhage, loss of fertility, and even death. Everyone experiencing a health or life-threatening emergency should be able to get the care they need—including an abortion—without political interference. Period. Full stop. End of story.
In Idaho, Texas, and other states around the country, pregnant people have already been turned away from hospitals, unable to get the emergency abortion care they need. Some have been forced to beg hospitals or courts for that care. Carving abortion care out of EMTALA would further decimate treatment options for patients experiencing pregnancy-related emergencies, increasing the risk of long-term negative health effects and fertility loss. It would deepen the United States’ existing maternal health crisis, particularly for Black, Indigenous, immigrant, rural, and low-income communities. And it would accelerate the exodus of health care providers from states with abortion restrictions, making pregnancy in those states even more dangerous than it already is. We will do everything in our power to stop that from happening.Here’s how we’re fighting back:
Thank you for all you do to fight for what’s right. I’m proud to fight by your side each and every day. In solidarity, Fatima Goss Graves |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.