Joe Biden Jumped at the Chance to Help George W. Bush Sell the Invasion of Iraq

01 March 20

It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News

I NEED YOU TO HELP FINISH THE FEBRUARY DRIVE - Jump in and help, please. “Someone else” is not going to do it. It must be you, and you and you. The exact same formula that applies for political action. “I will help, I will get involved.” We need to push now. / Marc Ash, Founder Reader Supported News

Sure, I'll make a donation!

---

Joe Biden Jumped at the Chance to Help George W. Bush Sell the Invasion of Iraq

Branko Marcetic, Jacobin
Marcetic writes: "Biden's position as Foreign Relations chairman, his tendency to get swept up in right-wing-engineered panics, his fear of being beaten by a more conservative challenger - all of it meant that when Bush embarked on his destructive path, Biden gave him the crucial assistance he needed to follow it through. His decision to do so would haunt him the rest of his career."
READ MORE

A woman wearing a face mask. (photo: Getty Images)

ALSO SEE: California Sees Third Case of 'Community Spread'
Coronavirus as First US Death Is Reported Near Seattle

Preparing for Coronavirus to Strike the US Is Your Civic Duty
Zeynep Tufekci, Scientific American
Tufekci writes: "Preparing for the almost inevitable global spread of this virus, now dubbed COVID-19, is one of the most pro-social, altruistic things you can do in response to potential disruptions of this kind."
READ MORE

With Bernie Sanders demonstrating strength among Latino and African American voters, Joe Biden will have to do better to catch up. (photo: Matt Rourke/AP)

Biden's Alive. In a Survival Contest, Will That Be Enough?
Jonathan Allen, NBC News
Allen writes: "This might not have been the win Joe Biden originally envisioned, but it's the one he needed."
READ MORE

Chris Matthews. (photo: Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

Chris Matthews Misses MSNBC South Carolina Primary Coverage After Sexism Accusations
Maxwell Tani, The Daily Beast
Tani writes: "A day after he was accused of sexual harassment by a journalist, MSNBC decided to keep host Chris Matthews off its airwaves during coverage of the South Carolina primary results."
READ MORE

Simone Biles, shown at national championships in August. (photo: Charlie Riedel/AP)

Simone Biles Blasts USA Gymnastics' Settlement Proposal; Aly Raisman Assails 'Massive Cover Up'
Liz Clarke, The Washington Post
Clarke writes: "Among Simone Biles's more impressive achievements in the run-up to the 2020 Tokyo Olympics has been her ability to compartmentalize - to focus on gymnastics while setting aside her anger and mistrust of USA Gymnastics and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee in the wake of the sport's sexual abuse scandal."
READ MORE

Law enforcement and first responders from Cumberland and York Counties participate in a regional active shooter training at Deering High School, Portland, Maine. (photo: Portland Press Herald/Getty Images)

Ban Traumatic 'Shooter Drills' in US Schools, Urge Teachers
Rob Walker, Guardian UK
Walker writes: "'Shooter drills', in which masked men carrying assault rifles burst into classrooms and simulate real-life gun attacks, are traumatising children and should be banned, America's two biggest teachers' unions have warned."
READ MORE

Wildfires in California. (photo: NBC)

For Fire-Traumatized Californians, the Future Looks Battery Powered
Nathanael Johnson, Grist
Johnson writes: "Naturally enough, gas-powered generator sales are booming. But a new, little-noticed report suggests a better option for backup power: solar panels and batteries."

mericans are so accustomed to reliable electricity that lives often depend on it. People with sleep apnea rely on electricity to keep them breathing through the night. People with diabetes need electricity to keep their insulin cold.

In California, however, the flow of electricity is no longer a sure thing. As the weather gets hotter and drier, utilities have begun shutting off power for days to keep electric lines from starting forest fires. When Pacific Gas & Electric flipped the switch in fire country last fall, food spoiled as freezers thawed and cars crashed as drivers attempted to navigate without traffic lights. [I kept trying to turn light switches on, so used to electricity that some stubborn part of my brain refused to accept that it was unavailable.]

Naturally enough, gas-powered generator sales are booming. But a new, little-noticed report suggests a better option for backup power: solar panels and batteries. It turns out that buying solar panels and batteries can be cheaper than buying a generator — given some patience, or financing.

“The good news is that solar and storage is cost effective, mostly because they provide value every day, not just during outages, cutting utility bills,” said Bentham Paulos, an author of the report commissioned by the nonprofit advocacy group Vote Solar based in Oakland, California.

I have to admit, I was skeptical. After all, a residential solar and battery system will set you back at least $27,000 — a lot more than the $3,000-ish needed to set up a portable generator.

So how can this be cheaper? In a word, time. Though it’s more expensive to install solar panels and batteries in the short run, the setup will eventually pay for itself by nearly eliminating electric power bills. Many Californians pay $1,500 a year for electricity. Let that run for 20 years, and you are talking about the price of a new pickup truck. Consider all the subsidies that the federal government pays to people who buy batteries and solar panels, and the renewable system is clearly cheaper.

The trick is figuring out the financing so that people can take advantage of the 20-year savings. The report offers a bunch of suggestions: local governments, for instance, could provide the cash, then take a piece of the savings as the money rolls in.

Paulos worked with Spencer Fields from EnergySage, a solar comparison-shopping business based in Boston, and they both got on the phone with me to explain their reasoning. Fields sent a spreadsheet showing their math, so I could tweak the numbers and try out different scenarios. They assumed that electricity bills would immediately leap 40 percent as utilities begin switching customers to a new “time of use” pricing scheme (and then rise a little bit each year), that a homeowner would be able to buy the backup-system without a loan, and that the house would draw 8,000 kilowatt hours a year — average for homes in California’s scorching Central Valley.

With all that, there was still a 20-year savings when I adjusted the formula to include a loan and rule out the dramatic price increase. Solar was only more expensive when I had the homeowner paying less than $500 a year for electricity. After spending a few hours playing with the math, it became clear that solar and batteries can pay for themselves under lots of different scenarios. There are thousands of Californians for whom this would make sense.

This particular study didn’t consider whether it would work anywhere else in the country. The basic logic remains the same everywhere, but California offers more subsidies than other states. Solar and storage would be the cheapest option for many more Californians if utilities start treating those home batteries like a power plant for use during periods of peak demand, said Chris Burgess, who works on making clean energy work for the nonprofit Rocky Mountain Institute. “There are very few places where solar plus storage pencils out, but only because the utilities aren’t correctly valuing it. If a utility just offers peak electricity payments to customers with batteries, rather than building a new peaking gas plant, the economics start to work,” he said.

“Solar and storage gets much more valuable with scale,” Burgess said. “The future is everyone having a big battery in their house, or in their neighborhood, or in their town.”

READ MORE

---

Contribute to RSN 

Update My Monthly Donation