RU BLOCKED — The war in Ukraine has accelerated Russian President Vladimir Putin’s efforts to crack down on dissent, offline and online. China already has blocked U.S. tech companies from operating on its soil. Putin is pushing Russia down a similar path, shattering the idea of a global internet village — but perhaps endorsing the tarnished idea that social media promotes individual freedom and threatens autocracy. The notion that social media could be used to topple dictatorial regimes gained traction during the Arab Spring, but has since been questioned as misinformation runs rampant. Nightly chatted with tech policy reporter Rebecca Kern over Slack today about the future of the internet in Russia. This conversation has been edited. How do Russians use social media? Many Russians use their own Russian social network called VK and the end-to-end encrypted messaging service Telegram to communicate currently. YouTube, which has a large following in Russia, with 80 to 85 percent of Russian internet users accessing it as of the end of 2020, is still available. And, while Google hasn’t been blocked yet, that may be moot if most people use Yandex anyway because it works better in Cyrillic searches. But Russia blocking Facebook and placing restrictions on Twitter can still impact Russian citizens because it dramatically limits the access they have to outside, independent news sources and connections to individuals in other countries. Citizens now have VK and their state-run media outlets RT and Sputnik available to them, making it harder to get a truthful depiction of what’s actually happening on the ground in Ukraine and what Russia’s role is there. The irony is that Russia also uses Facebook, Twitter and other U.S. social media platforms to spread Russian propaganda and disinformation. So it almost limits Russia’s reach of this propaganda when they block Facebook in their own country. How are U.S. tech companies handling this conflict? We already saw Russia start cracking down on outside tech companies with a new law requiring them to register with their communications regulator known as Roskomnadzor. You have to have a registered point of contact with this regulator. Facebook just complied with this requirement the week Russia invaded Ukraine. It’s going to put these companies in a difficult position as to whether they now want to continue to work there. U.S. social media companies, including Facebook, Twitter and Google’s YouTube, in the last 10 days have blocked RT and Sputnik from their services in Europe. And YouTube and Facebook have announced they are banning advertisements and monetization on all RT channels that are still running on all of their services around the remainder of the globe. However, it took public pressure — including calls from Sen. Mark Warner (chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee) before YouTube and Facebook stopped monetization on RT. How will this affect the internet that we all use? We’ll continue to see more U.S. social media and tech companies leave Russia because it’s becoming almost a liability to continue doing business there. This has huge implications for internet access and freedom and is the beginning of what some call the “splinternet” effect, which would create unequal access to internet services in the Eastern versus the Western hemispheres. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@politico.com. Or contact tonight’s author at rrayasam@politico.com, or on Twitter at @RenuRayasam.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.