01 March 21
It's Live on the HomePage Now:
Reader Supported News
RSN: Stephen Eric Bronner | Biden Strikes Back
Stephen Eric Bronner, Reader Supported News
Bronner writes: "Once again, the United States has unilaterally engaged in a first-strike attack on a sovereign state and in violation of international law."
raq is part of what is known as the “Shia Crescent,” which includes Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah paramilitary groups in Lebanon. When considering President Joe Biden’s attack on a small military site in eastern Syria, the response to three different missile attacks against American contractors and military by Iran-supported paramilitary organizations in Iraq, it is important to understand that the last two Republican presidents have sought to secure Israeli hegemony in the region. As for the Democratic Party, it has been agreeably supportive regarding Trump’s Middle East policy. Such support reaches back to the misguided Iraqi invasion of 2003, the fractious and disorganized resistance to Bashar al-Assad in the Syrian Civil War, and the game of chicken still being played with Iran.
Iraq, Syria, and Iran: each of these nations, in principle, could offset Israeli hegemony. Two are in ruins and the third is in a state of disarray. That can’t be an accident. With the “Abraham Accords” between Israel and various Sunni states in the region, moreover, Palestinians are in a state of economic despair, and they have become ever more isolated. In short, the security of Israel is guaranteed. The only possible hitch lies with Iran. Its theocratic government is appalling, but its reasons for resentment and frustration are real. Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, its most important scientist, was assassinated by a remote-controlled weapon in an Israel-led ambush; cyber-attacks occurred; President Barack Obama’s signal “nuclear treaty” was scrapped, and crippling sanctions were introduced by the Trump administration.
With its economy in tatters, its former foreign policy wrecked, and its regional prestige destroyed, Iran’s “liberal” political faction, led by President Hassan Rouhani and his foreign minister, Mohammed Zarif, has been thrown on the defensive. Its popular support is waning and the Revolutionary Guards – the vanguard of Iranian political reaction – are waiting in the wings. The current situation could give its leaders a domestic victory, which would surely impact on the delicate treaty negotiations in which President Biden must engage.
Neither Syria nor Iraq has a secure sovereign and, as a consequence, paramilitary organizations fueled by foreign powers are rife. Not only Iran but the United States is involved in the region: its military personnel and contractors were not in Syria for their health. President Biden was somewhat disingenuous in his “outrage” at the Iran-backed paramilitary attacks. He personally demanded a “proportionate response” against a “small site” of satellite forces with perhaps – wink! wink! – the secret agreement of the Iranian foreign ministry.
Please! Twenty-two people died. If the response was really “proportionate,” moreover, then nothing was accomplished. “Proportionate” bombing is a form of tit for tat; it is inherently symbolic and, since regime change is off the table and it’s early to talk about a treaty, President Biden’s strike was undertaken without an articulated end goal; indeed, the United States did not even know for certain which paramilitary group actually launched the attacks on its forces. Yet Sunni allies like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt – all of which have de facto made their peace with Israel – are undoubtedly pleased. Russia may feel wary, and Turkey too, with respect to the Kurds. Domestically, moreover, that is only to the good. Republicans can see that we are no longer being “pushed around,” the country can (momentarily) overcome its polarized politics, and Israel now knows that Trump is not its only American friend. What’s more, President Biden can begin to situate his Iranian foreign policy somewhere between that of Obama and Trump.
But it’s not that simple. Iran’s influence extends from Syria and Iraq to Yemen and Hezbollah in Lebanon. There can be no peace in the region without including Iran. President Biden is correct in emphasizing that any new nuclear treaty should involve discussions about Iran’s use of proxies and support for paramilitary organizations in the Middle East. With regard to America’s moral standing, however, now might have been the time to loosen sanctions or make some other gesture. The United States needs to decide what it wants in the long run, and that answer requires multilateral input from its European allies.
Once again, however, the United States has unilaterally engaged in a first-strike attack on a sovereign state and in violation of international law. President Biden’s action at best will have little future impact and, at worst, hinder any attempt to further a comprehensive settlement between enemies. It simply does not strike the right note for a new administration seeking to move in a new direction.
Stephen Eric Bronner is Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Rutgers University and Co-Director of the International Council for Diplomacy and Dialogue. His most recent work is The Sovereign (Routledge).
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.