LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....
ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON
MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON
|
|
zaterdag 20 december 2025
BREAKING: Boebert UNDER INVESTIGATION over tickets to Kid Rock COLORADO DESERVES BETTER
█████████
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....
ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON
MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON
Friend,
What the government just released on Jeffrey Epstein is not transparency. It’s calculated obstruction— an incomplete, context-stripped document dump designed to confuse the public, delay accountability, and exhaust survivors.
The DOJ's incomplete data dump is a violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. There is only one way to read this: as a cover-up and another violation of federal law by the Trump regime, engineered to delay accountability and shift the work to the public.
Releasing the files this way is obstruction by volume.
Do not mistake this for concern for survivors. They are not redacting for justice. Nothin surfaced voluntarily. Survivors, journalists, and sustained public pressure forced every detail into view.
The only accountability will be what we force them to take. The only justice will be what we create.
Add your name & demand the full release of the Epstein files.
— Women’s March
(If you've saved your payment information with ActBlue Express, your donation will go through immediately.)
Women’s March is a 501c(4) organization. Your generous support helps us prepare for fights we see coming and those we don’t. Donations are not tax-deductible. If you prefer to make a tax-deductible gift, we encourage you to support the Women’s March Network. Gifts to the Network support our organizing, communications, advocacy, and public education efforts. |
BREAKING: DOJ Epstein Files “Release” EXPOSED — Key Documents Are MISSING
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....
ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON
MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON
INTERNATIONAL CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING ORGANIZATION STILL CONCEALED
BY TRUMP'S DOJ!
BREAKING: DOJ Epstein Files “Release” EXPOSED — Key Documents Are MISSING
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Today was the deadline, and what we got was redactions and silence—how long will we let survivors be re-abused while the powerful stay protected and the real files “disappear”?
|
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
How many times are we going to watch them break the law in broad daylight?
Today was the day.
Today was the deadline. Today was the moment they were supposed to turn over the reports—the documents Trump signed off on, the materials they said would be released, the transparency they promised the American people and Congress.
And we all knew it wasn’t going to happen.
Not because we’re cynical — but because if you’ve been following me, subscribing, and actually listening to what I’ve been saying, then you already knew this was coming. I’ve been writing for months about what my sources have been warning: delay tactics, heavy redactions, distractions, and a deliberate plan to run out the clock—to drag this past the headlines, past the holidays, and past accountability.
But here’s the part that makes my stomach turn: I feel the worst for the survivors. Because this isn’t just politics—this is another slap from Donald Trump and the machine around him. Another message that says, “Your pain is negotiable. Your justice is optional.”
How long are we going to allow that?
How long are we going to let victims and survivors be re-abused by the very system that’s supposed to protect them?
Enough is enough.
And I’m telling you right now: we are not waiting for the midterms.
We are not waiting for the holidays to pass.
We are not waiting for the news cycle to “move on.”
We’re making our voices heard—loud and clear—right now.
What we witnessed today, was a cover-up in plain sight
This wasn’t a real release. It was a staged drip—heavy redactions, no accountability, no serious consequences, and nothing that truly touches powerful men.
And now I’m hearing something even more alarming: DOJ sources — including officials who’ve actually seen what’s inside the Epstein files — are telling me there’s real concern after today’s so-called “release.” Because documents that should have been turned over today aren’t just heavily redacted — they appear to be missing.
That matches what I’ve been warning you about for months: a major cover-up.
My sources are pointing to a pattern that looks like this:
Records scrubbed
Materials destroyed
Key documents withheld
A “release” designed to give the public just enough to argue about—while the real evidence is buried
This isn’t transparency. It’s evidence management. It’s clock management. It’s narrative management.
And I’m not going to sugarcoat it: they tried to steer the spotlight toward one famous name and away from the people with real power today. That’s not justice. That’s politics.
I know this playbook—because I lived inside it
For those of you who know my story: I was part of Trump’s inner circle.
I’ve watched them cover up, shift blame, rewrite timelines, and change the narrative with a straight face. They don’t come clean—they buy time and bury paper.
And yes—I still have sources who know what’s happening behind closed doors.
So when I tell you this is a cover-up, I’m not guessing.
After speaking with my congressional sources, I’m hearing impeachment articles are being drafted—because members are realizing what we’re dealing with:
If a deadline comes and goes, if critical documents “disappear,” if the public gets redactions instead of truth—that isn’t oversight. That’s obstruction.
But here’s the hard truth: impeachment takes bipartisan support.
And the only way we get that support right now is one way:
Pressure. Public pressure. Relentless pressure.
They’re counting on us to go quiet. They’re counting on the holidays. They’re counting on distraction. They’re counting on the news cycle flipping to something else.
My sources say they believe they bought time—Congress goes dark until January 5, Trump disappears into Mar-a-Lago, and everyone “moves on.”
We are not letting them.
Not one day.
Not one hour.
Not one inch.
Because survivors don’t get to “take the holidays off” from what happened to them.
So neither do we.
I give you my word: as someone who knows these people, who has been around them, and who understands how their cover-ups work, I will do everything in my power to make sure survivors get justice by exposing their corruption.
But I need you with me.
This is a grassroots movement and a professional operation—and we have to build both at the same time:
Grassroots: volunteers, organizing, calling offices, showing up, making noise
Professional: investigators, legal support, communications, rapid response—people who can fight this at scale
If you can volunteer, I need you:
Volunteer hotline: levpttp@proton.me
Tell us how you can help—calls, outreach, local organizing, content amplification, research support. We are building this everywhere.
If you can’t volunteer, you can still fuel the mission:
Become a paid subscriber here on Substack. That support keeps this independent and uncensored.
And if you’re able to contribute to the push we’re building:
GoFundMe: https://gofund.me/de2bd5474
Venmo: https://venmo.com/u/LEV-PARNAS
PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/LEVPARNAS
Zelle: thereallevparnas@gmail.com
Even if all you can do is five or ten dollars, please know this: it truly matters. Because it’s a hand on my shoulder that says, “Keep going. Don’t back down. We’re with you.” It’s solidarity you can feel, and it helps me keep the pressure on when they’re counting on us to fade out.
And please—Restack this. Share it. Text it to five people. They can’t bury what everyone is reading.
Let me end where we should have started: with the survivors.
They deserved truth today.
They deserved accountability today.
They deserved a system that protects them—not predators and power.
Instead, they got another delay, another dodge, another set of redactions—and now we’re hearing documents that should exist are missing.
So here’s what I believe:
“Let’s stop pretending this was about protecting survivors. Under Donald Trump and the inner circle that protects him, it’s always been about protecting the powerful—shielding the men, the networks, and the enablers who caused the harm, while survivors are forced to relive it in public silence.”
And here’s what I’m promising you:
Enough is enough.
We’re not waiting.
We’re not taking the holidays off.
We’re not letting them disappear the truth and re-abuse survivors with silence.
We are going to make Congress hear us.
We are going to force answers.
And we are going to keep the pressure on until justice is real—not performative.
-Lev Parnas
P.S. If you haven’t yet, go to levremembers.com and grab your copy of Shadow Diplomacy — the book Trump doesn’t want you to read, the blueprint that connects the dots to what you’re watching unfold in real time. And while you’re there, grab your “Enough Is Enough” gear—shirts, hats, and more—because it’s time we show what we are: a movement. Enough is enough.
Epstein Files “Release” Breaks the Law and is a Total Sham
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....
ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON
MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON
INTERNATIONAL CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING ORGANIZATION STILL CONCEALED
BY TRUMP'S DOJ!
Epstein Files “Release” Breaks the Law and is a Total Sham
The Justice Department’s heavily redacted Epstein release defied the law, retraumatized survivors, and again exposed a system designed to protect the powerful rather than the truth.
|
When the Trump administration promised compliance with the Epstein Transparency Act, the American public was told to expect sunlight. This is why I’ve repeatedly warned listeners of the MeidasTouch Podcast to not get their hopes up. I knew they’d release something to try to satiate the public’s demand for the files. To pretend that they were abiding by the law. I had a feeling they’d heavily redact most of the information under false pretenses, and then try to redirect attention towards other individuals, like Bill Clinton. I knew they’d do their best to hide any references to Donald Trump. And that’s exactly what happened.
I’m no clairvoyant. This was an easy prediction. It’s just what criminal regimes do.
What we got today was darkness by design, quite literally, with thousands of pages shrouded behind with large, black redactions. The Justice Department’s so-called release of Epstein files was not a good-faith effort to meet the law’s requirements. It was a calculated exercise in obstruction that clearly violated the statute, undermined congressional authority, and inflicted fresh harm on survivors of one of the most notorious child sex trafficking operations in modern history.
Let me be clear: this was not even an attempt make the cover up of the Epstein files look believable. This was somehow worse than the worst possible expectations for what Trump was going to produce as the deadline arrived to release them.
 |
The Act is not ambiguous. It requires the Department of Justice to release all unclassified Epstein-related records in its possession by a specific date, and to do so in a searchable format. Not phases. Not samplers. Not a heavily redacted performance meant to create the illusion of transparency. Yet when the DOJ unveiled its “Epstein Library,” the first words attached to the release were “First phase.” That phrase alone signaled noncompliance. Congress did not authorize a first phase. It mandated completion. Not some of the files. All of them.
What followed only confirmed the bad faith. The materials posted amounted to a fraction of what the DOJ has already admitted it possesses. Large portions were not merely redacted but rendered unreadable in their entirety: 119 pages of grand jury material blacked out from top to bottom, despite a federal judge ordering its release; dozens more documents similarly erased; court filings stripped of substance. Even where documents were technically included, many had already been public for years, recycled to pad page counts without adding disclosure.
The searchable database required by law did not function. Searches for obvious terms, like “Epstein,” returned no results. Anyone who has worked in litigation knows that producing large volumes of documents is not an exotic or burdensome task. Optical character recognition has been standard practice for decades. The failure here was intentional.
More troubling still was the standard the DOJ said it applied to redactions. According to the department’s own representations, the same protections used for victims were extended to “politically exposed persons” and wealthy individuals connected to Epstein. In other words, the powerful men who associated with, enabled, or potentially participated in Epstein’s crimes were treated as victims deserving anonymity. That inversion of justice echoes a familiar argument advanced by House Republican leadership when the law was debated: that transparency would unfairly harm the reputations of influential men. Remember when Speaker Johnson said that out loud? Congress rejected that premise. The DOJ resurrected it anyway.
The selectivity of the release made the motive unmistakable. Photographs of former President Bill Clinton with Epstein were prominently displayed, while references to others were aggressively obscured. Yet even this effort was imperfect. Incompetence or haste allowed several items involving Donald Trump to slip through the cracks: photographs from Epstein’s home that include Trump, and images connected to a $22,500 check bearing Trump’s signature. That amount matches a grotesque reference contained in Epstein’s birthday book, where a longtime Mar-a-Lago associate joked about selling a “fully depreciated” woman to Trump. That birthday book entry itself was not included in the DOJ’s release, despite its relevance and prior disclosure elsewhere.
The release also included a civil lawsuit filed by a Jane Doe describing abuse that began when she was 13 years old. The complaint recounts Epstein bringing her to Mar-a-Lago, where he introduced her to Donald J. Trump when she was 14. According to the filing, Epstein joked about her in Trump’s presence, and Trump responded with a smile and nod. These are sworn allegations, not commentary, and they underscore why full transparency matters. Survivors have already endured the unimaginable. Watching the federal government shield the powerful while erasing the record retraumatizes them all over again.
 |
Members of Congress who authored and enforced the law were unequivocal. Democratic lawmakers, including those who worked alongside Republican sponsors to pass the Act, stated publicly that the DOJ’s production did not comply with statutory requirements or court orders. They noted the absence of required explanations for redactions and the failure to produce draft indictments and other investigative materials known to exist. Some warned that contempt proceedings, impeachment inquiries, or criminal referrals could follow if obstruction continues. Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) said the Trump administration “grossly” violated the law he helped author along with Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA). “A future DOJ could convict the current AG and others because the Epstein Files Transparency Act is not like a Congressional Subpoena which expires at the end of each Congress,” he added on X. Khanna was blunt: “The DOJ’s document dump of hundreds of thousands of pages failed to comply with the law authored by @RepThomasMassie and me.”
 |
By contrast, other Republican leaders rushed to declare victory. House Oversight Chair James Comer praised the release as exactly what the public wanted, even as he acknowledged that much of it would take days to review and might duplicate prior disclosures. Other Republicans offered vague assurances that anyone implicated should be prosecuted, while ignoring the threshold problem that the evidence necessary to assess culpability was being withheld.
This is not a dispute over interpretation. It is a clear case of executive defiance. Congress passed a law. The president, after mounting pressure, signed it. The Department of Justice ignored it. That is theater. Not “the most transparent administration in history,” as administration officials are claiming today. It is also part of a broader pattern under a president whose personal history intersects uncomfortably with the subject at hand.
The Epstein Transparency Act was meant to restore public trust by exposing how a child sex trafficker operated with impunity for years, protected by wealth, connections, and institutional failure. The DOJ’s response did the opposite. It confirmed the suspicion that when accountability threatens the powerful, the machinery of government can still be bent to protect them.
Watch my latest report on the so-called “release” above. There will be much more to come. Stay tuned…
God's backyard plus four more stories
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER.....
ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON
MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CommonWealth Beacon, 11 Beacon Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02108, United States
| |||||||||||||||
|
BREAKING: Boebert UNDER INVESTIGATION over tickets to Kid Rock COLORADO DESERVES BETTER
LOTS OF POSTS IGNORED BY BLOGGER..... ALL POSTS ARE AVAILABLE ON MIDDLEBORO REVIEW AND SO ON Congresswoman Lauren Boebert has once agai...
-
04 April 23 Live on the homepage now! Reader Supported News Dahlia Lithwick | Let Donald Trump Cry It Out Dahlia Lithwick, Slate Lithwic...
-
A Democrat in the Wilderness Wow! That must have really got him mad!!! I Love it! ...
-
Israel on the Brink as Ultra-Orthodox Exemption from Military Service is Set to End Oakland, Ca. (Special to Informed Comment; Featured) –...
